Promoted by 9 supporters
0Supporters
Justice for Kimberly Antwinette Porter
On November 15, 2018, Kim Porter died from an undetermined cause. The fire department said she did from cardiac arrest. The media said she died from lung infection. her ex husband, Sean Combs said she died from the flu. The Los Angeles Medical Examiner said she was poisoned, then they changed the cause of death to pneumonia.We want the LAPD Homicide to reopen the case so we can find out the true cause of death for Kim Porter. We also want her body exhumed so the Medical Examiner can run test for poisons and tell us the real reason Kim died.It's been 6 years since Kim Porter died of an unknown cause. Now is the time to reopen her death investigation, because it was never investigated as a HOMICIDE. Now is the time for a real HOMICIDE investigation, so we can get Justice for Kim Porter.
Justice for Kimberly Antwinette Porter
On November 15, 2018, Kim Porter died from an undetermined cause. The fire department said she did from cardiac arrest. The media said she died from lung infection. her ex husband, Sean Combs said she died from the flu. The Los Angeles Medical Examiner said she was poisoned, then they changed the cause of death to pneumonia.
We want the LAPD Homicide to reopen the case so we can find out the true cause of death for Kim Porter. We also want her body exhumed so the Medical Examiner can run test for poisons and tell us the real reason Kim died.
It's been 6 years since Kim Porter died of an unknown cause. Now is the time to reopen her death investigation, because it was never investigated as a HOMICIDE. Now is the time for a real HOMICIDE investigation, so we can get Justice for Kim Porter.
You signed!
Promoted by 9 supporters
0Supporters
Justice for Kimberly Antwinette Porter
On November 15, 2018, Kim Porter died from an undetermined cause. The fire department said she did from cardiac arrest. The media said she died from lung infection. her ex husband, Sean Combs said she died from the flu. The Los Angeles Medical Examiner said she was poisoned, then they changed the cause of death to pneumonia.We want the LAPD Homicide to reopen the case so we can find out the true cause of death for Kim Porter. We also want her body exhumed so the Medical Examiner can run test for poisons and tell us the real reason Kim died.It's been 6 years since Kim Porter died of an unknown cause. Now is the time to reopen her death investigation, because it was never investigated as a HOMICIDE. Now is the time for a real HOMICIDE investigation, so we can get Justice for Kim Porter.
Justice for Kimberly Antwinette Porter
On November 15, 2018, Kim Porter died from an undetermined cause. The fire department said she did from cardiac arrest. The media said she died from lung infection. her ex husband, Sean Combs said she died from the flu. The Los Angeles Medical Examiner said she was poisoned, then they changed the cause of death to pneumonia.
We want the LAPD Homicide to reopen the case so we can find out the true cause of death for Kim Porter. We also want her body exhumed so the Medical Examiner can run test for poisons and tell us the real reason Kim died.
It's been 6 years since Kim Porter died of an unknown cause. Now is the time to reopen her death investigation, because it was never investigated as a HOMICIDE. Now is the time for a real HOMICIDE investigation, so we can get Justice for Kim Porter.
Promoted by 137 supporters
0Supporters
Demand Merrick Garland Investigate Donald Trump for Threatening President Biden.
Attorney General Merrick Garland,We, the undersigned, write to you today with the utmost concern regarding a recent development that has come to light. It has been brought to our attention that a video has surfaced on social media in which former President Donald J. Trump appears to make a direct and explicit threat against the life of the current President of the United States.As you are aware, threatening the President is a federal offense under 18 U.S. Code § 871. This statute prohibits the knowing and willful making of "any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States."Furthermore, the transmission of such threats in interstate commerce, as in the case of the video being circulated on social media, is also prohibited under 18 U.S. Code § 875. This law prohibits the transmission of any communication containing a threat to injure the person of another.Given the gravity of these allegations and the potential threat they pose to the safety and security of the President, it is imperative that this matter be thoroughly investigated. We urge the Department of Justice to use all available resources to identify and apprehend those responsible for making these threats.Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. We trust that you will take swift and decisive action to address this threat to our nation.Sincerely,The Country That Put You Into Office.
Demand Merrick Garland Investigate Donald Trump for Threatening President Biden.
Attorney General Merrick Garland,
We, the undersigned, write to you today with the utmost concern regarding a recent development that has come to light. It has been brought to our attention that a video has surfaced on social media in which former President Donald J. Trump appears to make a direct and explicit threat against the life of the current President of the United States.
As you are aware, threatening the President is a federal offense under 18 U.S. Code § 871. This statute prohibits the knowing and willful making of "any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States."
Furthermore, the transmission of such threats in interstate commerce, as in the case of the video being circulated on social media, is also prohibited under 18 U.S. Code § 875. This law prohibits the transmission of any communication containing a threat to injure the person of another.
Given the gravity of these allegations and the potential threat they pose to the safety and security of the President, it is imperative that this matter be thoroughly investigated. We urge the Department of Justice to use all available resources to identify and apprehend those responsible for making these threats.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. We trust that you will take swift and decisive action to address this threat to our nation.
Sincerely,
The Country That Put You Into Office.
Promoted by 4 supporters
0Supporters
Demand All Insurance Claims to be investigated by Licensed Adjusters
As someone who has personally experienced the consequences of insurance claims being handled by untrained and unlicensed individuals, I am calling for a change. In recent years a couple companies have grown into massive conglomerates worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Their business model? Employing unlicensed and untrained individuals to perform inspections for insurance companies. This practice is not only unethical but also detrimental to all insured parties. Many policyholders are being shortchanged by incomplete inspections or misled about damage.An inspection requires meticulous attention to detail and it is crucial that every bit of damage is accounted for, ensuring that the insured party can fully recover. However, there are countless individuals being informed that their claims hold no damage or only partial damage due to incomplete inspections.The lack of professional scrutiny in these inspections often leads to missed damages or overpaid claims. This results in higher premiums for everyone, affecting us all directly or indirectly. The need for detailed inspection from licensed adjusters cannot be overstated.This situation is not just a personal issue; it's a widespread problem affecting many insureds across our nation. According to data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), consumer complaints about claim handling have consistently ranked among the top five issues in recent years.According to a report from The Institutes Risk & Insurance Knowledge Group, inaccurate claim evaluations can cost insurers up to 25% more per claim (The Institutes Risk & Insurance Knowledge Group, 2019). This unnecessary expense is ultimately passed onto policyholders through higher premiums - an unjust consequence for those already facing potential loss or damage.We demand that all insurance claims be investigated by a licensed insurance adjuster. This will ensure fairness, accuracy, and trustworthiness in our system - values that should never be compromised. Furthermore, this will protect both insurers and insureds from potential financial losses.The integrity of our insurance system depends on fair and accurate investigations - let's fight together for this crucial reform. Please sign this petition urging lawmakers to mandate licensed adjusters for all claims investigations.
Demand All Insurance Claims to be investigated by Licensed Adjusters
As someone who has personally experienced the consequences of insurance claims being handled by untrained and unlicensed individuals, I am calling for a change. In recent years a couple companies have grown into massive conglomerates worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Their business model? Employing unlicensed and untrained individuals to perform inspections for insurance companies. This practice is not only unethical but also detrimental to all insured parties. Many policyholders are being shortchanged by incomplete inspections or misled about damage.
An inspection requires meticulous attention to detail and it is crucial that every bit of damage is accounted for, ensuring that the insured party can fully recover. However, there are countless individuals being informed that their claims hold no damage or only partial damage due to incomplete inspections.
The lack of professional scrutiny in these inspections often leads to missed damages or overpaid claims. This results in higher premiums for everyone, affecting us all directly or indirectly. The need for detailed inspection from licensed adjusters cannot be overstated.
This situation is not just a personal issue; it's a widespread problem affecting many insureds across our nation. According to data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), consumer complaints about claim handling have consistently ranked among the top five issues in recent years.
According to a report from The Institutes Risk & Insurance Knowledge Group, inaccurate claim evaluations can cost insurers up to 25% more per claim (The Institutes Risk & Insurance Knowledge Group, 2019). This unnecessary expense is ultimately passed onto policyholders through higher premiums - an unjust consequence for those already facing potential loss or damage.
We demand that all insurance claims be investigated by a licensed insurance adjuster. This will ensure fairness, accuracy, and trustworthiness in our system - values that should never be compromised. Furthermore, this will protect both insurers and insureds from potential financial losses.
The integrity of our insurance system depends on fair and accurate investigations - let's fight together for this crucial reform. Please sign this petition urging lawmakers to mandate licensed adjusters for all claims investigations.
Promoted by 315 supporters
0Supporters
Honor U.S. MACV-SOG with the Congressional Gold Medal
We, the concerned citizens of the United States, call upon Congress to award the U.S Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Studies and Observations Group (MACV-SOG) with a well-deserved Congressional Gold Medal. MACV-SOG was an elite special operations unit that played a vital role during the Vietnam War. During its existence from 1964 to 1972, MACV-SOG conducted highly classified and dangerous covert operations behind enemy lines in Southeast Asia. Composed of highly trained personnel from all branches of the military, including Special Forces soldiers and intelligence operatives, MACV-SOG carried out unconventional warfare missions that were critical to our national security objectives.Here are some compelling reasons why we believe MACV-SOG deserves this prestigious recognition:1. Extraordinary Valor: The members of MACV-SOG demonstrated exceptional bravery in executing their missions under extremely hazardous conditions. They faced constant danger from enemy forces while operating deep within hostile territory.2. Highly Successful Operations: Despite being outnumbered and outgunned by North Vietnamese forces, MACV-SOG achieved remarkable success throughout its existence. Their intelligence gathering efforts provided crucial information for strategic decision-making by American commanders.3. Covert Operations Expertise: The unique capabilities developed by MACV-SOG set new standards for unconventional warfare tactics and techniques that continue to influence modern special operations units today.4. Sacrifice and Losses: Casualty rates for SOG reconnaissance teams during the eight-year secret war fought across the fence in Laos, Cambodia and North Vietnam exceeded 100%, meaningevery man was wounded at least once and approximately half were killed.Of the 1,579 Americans missing in action from the Vietnam War, 50 are from the group. At least 11 SOG teams, perhaps more, simply vanished.5. Secrecy & Recognition Delay: Due to the classified nature of their missions, much of what they accomplished remained unknown until decades later when declassified documents shed light on their extraordinary contributions.6. Support for Veterans: Recognizing MACV-SOG with the Congressional Gold Medal would not only honor their service but also raise awareness about their sacrifices and provide long-overdue recognition to the surviving veterans and families of those who have passed away.We urge Congress to acknowledge the immense contributions of MACV-SOG by awarding them the Congressional Gold Medal. This prestigious honor would serve as a lasting tribute to their bravery, sacrifice, and unwavering commitment to defending our nation's interests during one of America's most challenging conflicts.Sources:- "MACV-SOG: A Unit History" by Major John L. Plaster- "SOG: The Secret Wars of America's Commandos in Vietnam" by John L. Plaster- Declassified documents from National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)- Testimonies from MACV-SOG veteransPlease join us in supporting this petition to ensure that these unsung heroes receive the recognition they so rightfully deserve. Together, let us honor MACV-SOG for their extraordinary service and preserve their legacy for future generations.NOTE: You do not need to add a monetary contribution to support this petition. You can skip that part of the signature process by choosing "share instead". Then on the Share page, please share there or you can scroll down to the bottom and choose "skip for now". Your signature is greatly appreciated!
Honor U.S. MACV-SOG with the Congressional Gold Medal
We, the concerned citizens of the United States, call upon Congress to award the U.S Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Studies and Observations Group (MACV-SOG) with a well-deserved Congressional Gold Medal. MACV-SOG was an elite special operations unit that played a vital role during the Vietnam War. During its existence from 1964 to 1972, MACV-SOG conducted highly classified and dangerous covert operations behind enemy lines in Southeast Asia. Composed of highly trained personnel from all branches of the military, including Special Forces soldiers and intelligence operatives, MACV-SOG carried out unconventional warfare missions that were critical to our national security objectives.Here are some compelling reasons why we believe MACV-SOG deserves this prestigious recognition:1. Extraordinary Valor: The members of MACV-SOG demonstrated exceptional bravery in executing their missions under extremely hazardous conditions. They faced constant danger from enemy forces while operating deep within hostile territory.2. Highly Successful Operations: Despite being outnumbered and outgunned by North Vietnamese forces, MACV-SOG achieved remarkable success throughout its existence. Their intelligence gathering efforts provided crucial information for strategic decision-making by American commanders.3. Covert Operations Expertise: The unique capabilities developed by MACV-SOG set new standards for unconventional warfare tactics and techniques that continue to influence modern special operations units today.4. Sacrifice and Losses: Casualty rates for SOG reconnaissance teams during the eight-year secret war fought across the fence in Laos, Cambodia and North Vietnam exceeded 100%, meaningevery man was wounded at least once and approximately half were killed.Of the 1,579 Americans missing in action from the Vietnam War, 50 are from the group. At least 11 SOG teams, perhaps more, simply vanished.5. Secrecy & Recognition Delay: Due to the classified nature of their missions, much of what they accomplished remained unknown until decades later when declassified documents shed light on their extraordinary contributions.6. Support for Veterans: Recognizing MACV-SOG with the Congressional Gold Medal would not only honor their service but also raise awareness about their sacrifices and provide long-overdue recognition to the surviving veterans and families of those who have passed away.We urge Congress to acknowledge the immense contributions of MACV-SOG by awarding them the Congressional Gold Medal. This prestigious honor would serve as a lasting tribute to their bravery, sacrifice, and unwavering commitment to defending our nation's interests during one of America's most challenging conflicts.Sources:- "MACV-SOG: A Unit History" by Major John L. Plaster- "SOG: The Secret Wars of America's Commandos in Vietnam" by John L. Plaster- Declassified documents from National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)- Testimonies from MACV-SOG veteransPlease join us in supporting this petition to ensure that these unsung heroes receive the recognition they so rightfully deserve. Together, let us honor MACV-SOG for their extraordinary service and preserve their legacy for future generations.
NOTE: You do not need to add a monetary contribution to support this petition. You can skip that part of the signature process by choosing "share instead". Then on the Share page, please share there or you can scroll down to the bottom and choose "skip for now". Your signature is greatly appreciated!
Promoted by 63 supporters
0Supporters
Save Roosevelt Building from Demolition
Roosevelt Elementary is a beautiful and STURDY 104-year-old school building in Keego Harbor, Michigan. Despite endless community opposition, the West Bloomfield School District has signed contracts to abate and demolish this beloved building in the heart of our tiny city.Time is running out, but WE ARE STILL FIGHTING AND NEED HELP!A generous $1.7M offer to purchase the building has been ignored.Selling the building for $1.7M would also save on projected demolition costs and generate $2.25M in cost savings for taxpayers, compared to the District's current profit estimate of $600k.Alarmingly, the School Board has not publicly debated this or any other purchase offer/letter of intent, nor have they explained a reason for their demolition votes.Our list of concerns goes on, but so does our fight to preserve the irreplaceable Roosevelt Building!We need citizens of Keego Harbor and our neighboring communities, as well as those who are passionate about historic building preservation to sign this petition and speak up in support of marketing the property and repurposing our beloved Roosevelt building.In addition to signing this petition, please join our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saverooseveltThis is only inevitable if we allow it!
Save Roosevelt Building from Demolition
Roosevelt Elementary is a beautiful and STURDY 104-year-old school building in Keego Harbor, Michigan. Despite endless community opposition, the West Bloomfield School District has signed contracts to abate and demolish this beloved building in the heart of our tiny city.
Time is running out, but WE ARE STILL FIGHTING AND NEED HELP!
A generous $1.7M offer to purchase the building has been ignored.
Selling the building for $1.7M would also save on projected demolition costs and generate $2.25M in cost savings for taxpayers, compared to the District's current profit estimate of $600k.
Alarmingly, the School Board has not publicly debated this or any other purchase offer/letter of intent, nor have they explained a reason for their demolition votes.
Our list of concerns goes on, but so does our fight to preserve the irreplaceable Roosevelt Building!
We need citizens of Keego Harbor and our neighboring communities, as well as those who are passionate about historic building preservation to sign this petition and speak up in support of marketing the property and repurposing our beloved Roosevelt building.
In addition to signing this petition, please join our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saveroosevelt
This is only inevitable if we allow it!
Promoted by 1 supporter
0Supporters
Stop NC tax on Federal Student Loan forgiveness
We are rallying for a fundamental change in North Carolina's taxation policies regarding forgiven student loans. President Biden's recent decision to forgive Art Institute student loans has spotlighted a glaring issue: the unjust taxation burden placed on those seeking relief from crippling student debt, particularly victims of fraudulent for-profit colleges.Thousands of students have fallen prey to deceitful practices, promised an education that never materialized, only to be saddled with insurmountable debt. Forgiving these loans is not just an act of compassion; it's a moral imperative to correct a grave injustice. However, current taxation policies exacerbate the financial hardship faced by these individuals, compounding their struggles.North Carolina's insistence on collecting taxes on forgiven student loans is a double-edged sword, plunging victims deeper into financial turmoil while the federal government attempts to right a wrong.We call upon our leaders to:1.Advocate for fair taxation policies that exempt forgiven student loans from both federal and state taxes, especially for victims of fraud.Ensure that all forms of student loan forgiveness, including Public Service Loan Forgiveness and Income-Driven Repayment forgiveness, are not subjected to unjust taxation.Support legislative initiatives aimed at rectifying these taxation issues and providing much-needed relief to affected individuals.Raise awareness about the critical need for fair taxation on student loan forgiveness and mobilize public support for essential reformsJoin us in demanding fair taxation for student loan forgiveness in North Carolina. Let's champion equity, justice, and economic opportunity for all. Sign the petition now to make a tangible difference in the lives of those burdened by student debt. Together, we can usher in a fairer, more equitable future for generations to come.
Stop NC tax on Federal Student Loan forgiveness
We are rallying for a fundamental change in North Carolina's taxation policies regarding forgiven student loans. President Biden's recent decision to forgive Art Institute student loans has spotlighted a glaring issue: the unjust taxation burden placed on those seeking relief from crippling student debt, particularly victims of fraudulent for-profit colleges.
Thousands of students have fallen prey to deceitful practices, promised an education that never materialized, only to be saddled with insurmountable debt. Forgiving these loans is not just an act of compassion; it's a moral imperative to correct a grave injustice. However, current taxation policies exacerbate the financial hardship faced by these individuals, compounding their struggles.
North Carolina's insistence on collecting taxes on forgiven student loans is a double-edged sword, plunging victims deeper into financial turmoil while the federal government attempts to right a wrong.
We call upon our leaders to:
1.Advocate for fair taxation policies that exempt forgiven student loans from both federal and state taxes, especially for victims of fraud.Ensure that all forms of student loan forgiveness, including Public Service Loan Forgiveness and Income-Driven Repayment forgiveness, are not subjected to unjust taxation.Support legislative initiatives aimed at rectifying these taxation issues and providing much-needed relief to affected individuals.Raise awareness about the critical need for fair taxation on student loan forgiveness and mobilize public support for essential reforms
Join us in demanding fair taxation for student loan forgiveness in North Carolina. Let's champion equity, justice, and economic opportunity for all. Sign the petition now to make a tangible difference in the lives of those burdened by student debt. Together, we can usher in a fairer, more equitable future for generations to come.
Promoted by 1 supporter
0Supporters
Secure a Fair Trial for Bryan Kohberger by Changing the Venue
Bryan Kohberger, a young man caught in the crosshairs of an extremely prejudiced mainstream media, is facing an uphill battle. The horrifying murders of the Idaho 4 have gripped our nation, and unfortunately, Bryan has been implicated in this case. Despite substantial evidence showing multiple people involved in these killings and numerous witnesses who did not identify Bryan among those killers, he is still being held accountable.The bias against him is palpable - from Latah County to Judge John Judge. The media's portrayal of him has already tainted public opinion so much that it threatens his right to a fair trial. This situation could lead to dire consequences - even execution by firing squad.It's crucial that we uphold the principles of justice - innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. A change of venue for his trial would be a step towards ensuring impartiality and fairness in this process.We must act now to prevent an irreversible miscarriage of justice from taking place. We call upon you to support this petition demanding a change of venue for Bryan Kohberger's trial; let us ensure he gets the fair trial he deserves! Please sign this petition today!
Secure a Fair Trial for Bryan Kohberger by Changing the Venue
Bryan Kohberger, a young man caught in the crosshairs of an extremely prejudiced mainstream media, is facing an uphill battle. The horrifying murders of the Idaho 4 have gripped our nation, and unfortunately, Bryan has been implicated in this case. Despite substantial evidence showing multiple people involved in these killings and numerous witnesses who did not identify Bryan among those killers, he is still being held accountable.The bias against him is palpable - from Latah County to Judge John Judge. The media's portrayal of him has already tainted public opinion so much that it threatens his right to a fair trial. This situation could lead to dire consequences - even execution by firing squad.It's crucial that we uphold the principles of justice - innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. A change of venue for his trial would be a step towards ensuring impartiality and fairness in this process.We must act now to prevent an irreversible miscarriage of justice from taking place. We call upon you to support this petition demanding a change of venue for Bryan Kohberger's trial; let us ensure he gets the fair trial he deserves! Please sign this petition today!
Promoted by 147 supporters
0Supporters
Free Christina Boyer!
SIGN THIS PETITION TO SUPPORT CHRISTINA BOYER'S RELEASE FROM PULASKI STATE PRISON.If you want to support Christina's legal, daily, and (hopefully) post-release financial needs, please consider donating via her GoFundMe.UPDATE: PAST AND FUTURE DONORS PLEASE READ. GoFundMe is the ONLY platform through which you can financially support Christina. Any donations made via Change.org go directly to Change.org itself, NOT to Christina. Change.org fundraises for itself on each petition, independent of petition organizers.Christina Boyer has been incarcerated since 1992 for the murder of her three-year-old daughter, Amber. She accepted a plea deal through which she was told she could maintain her innocence, and was sentenced to life plus twenty years with the possibility of parole. Her story was recently featured in the ABC Studios documentary Demons and Saviors (Latchkey Films, 2023, available to stream on Hulu).Amber died while in the care of Christina's boyfriend at the time, David. Christina was not with Amber during the six hours leading up to her death. Medical evidence indicates that Amber’s death occurred during those six hours.David went to trial after Christina entered her plea. He received a 20-year sentence for cruelty to children and was released in 2011.Christina was told the best way to avoid the death penalty was to accept the guilty plea. Under the Supreme Court case Alford v. North Carolina, Christina should have been able to maintain her innocence and—if she did her time and followed the rules— might eventually receive parole.However, officials in Georgia have made it clear they will not release Christina unless she admits to something she did not do: beating her daughter to death.Christina has served well over the national average sentence for second degree murder, and 10 years more than Georgia's maximum sentence for cruelty to children. It is time for Christina to come home, to spend the rest of her life with her family and friends, and to finally get the chance to visit Amber's grave and properly mourn her daughter.Christina is keen to be a productive member of society. In prison, she is a mentor to others and a strong member of the prison faith community. She obtained her Associate's degree and is working on her Bachelor's. Other incarcerated women and prison staff speak very highly of her.Christina and her family and friends are continuing to receive legal advice about her best legal options; this petition is part of a broader legal strategy to eventually bring Christina home.You can learn more about Christina's case on her website.
Free Christina Boyer!
SIGN THIS PETITION TO SUPPORT CHRISTINA BOYER'S RELEASE FROM PULASKI STATE PRISON.
If you want to support Christina's legal, daily, and (hopefully) post-release financial needs, please consider donating via her GoFundMe.
UPDATE: PAST AND FUTURE DONORS PLEASE READ. GoFundMe is the ONLY platform through which you can financially support Christina. Any donations made via Change.org go directly to Change.org itself, NOT to Christina. Change.org fundraises for itself on each petition, independent of petition organizers.
Christina Boyer has been incarcerated since 1992 for the murder of her three-year-old daughter, Amber. She accepted a plea deal through which she was told she could maintain her innocence, and was sentenced to life plus twenty years with the possibility of parole. Her story was recently featured in the ABC Studios documentary Demons and Saviors (Latchkey Films, 2023, available to stream on Hulu).
Amber died while in the care of Christina's boyfriend at the time, David. Christina was not with Amber during the six hours leading up to her death. Medical evidence indicates that Amber’s death occurred during those six hours.
David went to trial after Christina entered her plea. He received a 20-year sentence for cruelty to children and was released in 2011.
Christina was told the best way to avoid the death penalty was to accept the guilty plea. Under the Supreme Court case Alford v. North Carolina, Christina should have been able to maintain her innocence and—if she did her time and followed the rules— might eventually receive parole.
However, officials in Georgia have made it clear they will not release Christina unless she admits to something she did not do: beating her daughter to death.
Christina has served well over the national average sentence for second degree murder, and 10 years more than Georgia's maximum sentence for cruelty to children. It is time for Christina to come home, to spend the rest of her life with her family and friends, and to finally get the chance to visit Amber's grave and properly mourn her daughter.
Christina is keen to be a productive member of society. In prison, she is a mentor to others and a strong member of the prison faith community. She obtained her Associate's degree and is working on her Bachelor's. Other incarcerated women and prison staff speak very highly of her.
Christina and her family and friends are continuing to receive legal advice about her best legal options; this petition is part of a broader legal strategy to eventually bring Christina home.
You can learn more about Christina's case on her website.
Promoted by 3 supporters
0Supporters
Stop St. Olaf's transition to Oracle in protest of investment in Israel
[pictured above: Oracle CEO Safra Catz and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu]In 2023, St. Olaf College partnered with tech giant Oracle to manage student, faculty, and staff employment and payment. We call on St. Olaf to stop the ongoing transition of information services to Oracle, in protest of the corporation's investments in and service to the State of Israel.Read the details of Oracle's involvement here:Oracle Stands with Israel: St. Olaf's new information system unveils $319 million plan for continued investmentThe Israeli military has killed more than thirty thousand Palestinians since October 7, 2023, and PM Benjamin Netanyahu continues to refuse a ceasefire. We believe that St. Olaf College should not strengthen connections with Oracle, a corporation which has not only been silent on these deaths, but has vowed to increase services for the State of Israel since October 7. Refusing further integration of Oracle’s services is the least that St. Olaf can do in response to the Israeli government's atrocities.
Stop St. Olaf's transition to Oracle in protest of investment in Israel
[pictured above: Oracle CEO Safra Catz and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu]
In 2023, St. Olaf College partnered with tech giant Oracle to manage student, faculty, and staff employment and payment. We call on St. Olaf to stop the ongoing transition of information services to Oracle, in protest of the corporation's investments in and service to the State of Israel.
Read the details of Oracle's involvement here:Oracle Stands with Israel: St. Olaf's new information system unveils $319 million plan for continued investment
The Israeli military has killed more than thirty thousand Palestinians since October 7, 2023, and PM Benjamin Netanyahu continues to refuse a ceasefire. We believe that St. Olaf College should not strengthen connections with Oracle, a corporation which has not only been silent on these deaths, but has vowed to increase services for the State of Israel since October 7. Refusing further integration of Oracle’s services is the least that St. Olaf can do in response to the Israeli government's atrocities.
Promoted by 76 supporters
0Supporters
Protection and Preservation of Special Education Services in Portland Public Schools
Dear Interim Superintendent Dr. Husk, Chief Academic Officer Cheryl Proctor, and Chief of Student Support Services Jey Buno,The district’s recently released “Budget Development Update” suggests that the Adapted Physical Education (APE) team along with supports described in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) will be facing harmful cuts and changes in programming for the 2024-2025 school year. To eliminate parts of the APE program is a step in the wrong direction toward the PPS vision of equity. We feel you would not cut this program if you understood what specialized services we provide to students and how much it improves not only their quality of life in school, but also their ability to thrive in physical and social environments outside of the learning environment.The district recently shared the news that it is planning on cutting 4 of the 8 Adapted PE teacher positions. This will leave 2 Adapted PE teachers to provide professional development for thegeneral PE department while also working with the other remaining 2 teachers to provideservices to over 400 students in the district. Due to extremely higher teacher caseloads, this decision will cause a harmful reduction in the amount of direct specially designed instruction students are able and required to receive in PE.We also received news that our students with disabilities will be expected to attend general physical education classes, regardless of the service placement described in their Individualized Education Plans (IEPs). This will cause inappropriate service placement for some and be a clear violation of FAPE. To add to this issue, the general PE department will also be receiving cuts which will directly affect class sizes by increasing the size of class our students with disabilities will be expected to join. This will undoubtedly create unsafe and overwhelming learning environments for our neurodivergent populations, those with physical disabilities, visual impairments, other sensory impairments, and for those who are considered medically fragile and have multiple disabilities, just to name a few.The Adapted PE team has 8 highly qualified APE teachers with extensive knowledge and experience in providing federally mandated APE services to students with disabilities in all grades in a variety of settings in accordance with their IEPs. Our APE teachers understand Special Education law & the process for properly considering a student’s abilities, their strengths and needs, along with data from their most recent APE evaluation results when determining their least restrictive environment.No plan has been shared as to how the district will stay in compliance of IEPs and IDEA following the newly recommended changes. Our community of educators, students, families, and taxpayers hope that you will reconsider this decision to make cuts to the Adapted PE team.Sincerely,PPS Adapted Physical Education Teachers
Protection and Preservation of Special Education Services in Portland Public Schools
Dear Interim Superintendent Dr. Husk, Chief Academic Officer Cheryl Proctor, and Chief of Student Support Services Jey Buno,
The district’s recently released “Budget Development Update” suggests that the Adapted Physical Education (APE) team along with supports described in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) will be facing harmful cuts and changes in programming for the 2024-2025 school year. To eliminate parts of the APE program is a step in the wrong direction toward the PPS vision of equity. We feel you would not cut this program if you understood what specialized services we provide to students and how much it improves not only their quality of life in school, but also their ability to thrive in physical and social environments outside of the learning environment.
The district recently shared the news that it is planning on cutting 4 of the 8 Adapted PE teacher positions. This will leave 2 Adapted PE teachers to provide professional development for thegeneral PE department while also working with the other remaining 2 teachers to provideservices to over 400 students in the district. Due to extremely higher teacher caseloads, this decision will cause a harmful reduction in the amount of direct specially designed instruction students are able and required to receive in PE.
We also received news that our students with disabilities will be expected to attend general physical education classes, regardless of the service placement described in their Individualized Education Plans (IEPs). This will cause inappropriate service placement for some and be a clear violation of FAPE. To add to this issue, the general PE department will also be receiving cuts which will directly affect class sizes by increasing the size of class our students with disabilities will be expected to join. This will undoubtedly create unsafe and overwhelming learning environments for our neurodivergent populations, those with physical disabilities, visual impairments, other sensory impairments, and for those who are considered medically fragile and have multiple disabilities, just to name a few.
The Adapted PE team has 8 highly qualified APE teachers with extensive knowledge and experience in providing federally mandated APE services to students with disabilities in all grades in a variety of settings in accordance with their IEPs. Our APE teachers understand Special Education law & the process for properly considering a student’s abilities, their strengths and needs, along with data from their most recent APE evaluation results when determining their least restrictive environment.
No plan has been shared as to how the district will stay in compliance of IEPs and IDEA following the newly recommended changes. Our community of educators, students, families, and taxpayers hope that you will reconsider this decision to make cuts to the Adapted PE team.
Sincerely,
PPS Adapted Physical Education Teachers
Promoted by 38 supporters
0Supporters
Get President Biden to Award These 5 Heroes the Presidential Medal of Freedom!
When Army Reservist and Texas State Trooper LeRoy Torres returned from a 2007 deployment to Balad, Iraq, he was hospitalized with lung damage from burn pits. In these open-air burn pits, the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan burned everything “from batteries to body parts.”When his failing health forced him to leave the Reserves and resign from the Department of Public Safety in 2008, Torres was denied benefits from both employers. That’s when his wife Rosie stepped in to become his advocate.While struggling on their own, Rosie and LeRoy foundedBurn Pits 360 --- the only 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that offered an independent burn pit exposure registry where family members could record the names of their veterans who were suffering from illnesses attributed to burn pit exposure. But Rosie and LeRoy DIDN'T realize they were starting a movement. It wasn't long before JON STEWART (former host of The Daily Show & longstanding supporter of 9/11 survivors),JOHN FEAL (Founder of Feal Good Foundation and No Responders Left Behind), and JOSEPH MCKAY (New York City firefighter and 9/11 first responder)joined the fight.On August 10, 2022, these five heroes watched as President Joe Biden signed the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act which will expand eligibility for VA health care and benefits for millions of veterans suffering from health issues because of exposure to burn pits and other toxins in war zones.Please watch documentary trailer below.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8SBFOUxE4cBut the PACT Act wouldn't have passed had it not been for the tireless work of these heroes. Help us mobilize America once more and SIGN THE PETITION to get President Joe Biden to award each of them the Presidential Medal of Freedom!
Get President Biden to Award These 5 Heroes the Presidential Medal of Freedom!
When Army Reservist and Texas State Trooper LeRoy Torres returned from a 2007 deployment to Balad, Iraq, he was hospitalized with lung damage from burn pits. In these open-air burn pits, the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan burned everything “from batteries to body parts.”When his failing health forced him to leave the Reserves and resign from the Department of Public Safety in 2008, Torres was denied benefits from both employers. That’s when his wife Rosie stepped in to become his advocate.
While struggling on their own, Rosie and LeRoy foundedBurn Pits 360 --- the only 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that offered an independent burn pit exposure registry where family members could record the names of their veterans who were suffering from illnesses attributed to burn pit exposure. But Rosie and LeRoy DIDN'T realize they were starting a movement. It wasn't long before JON STEWART (former host of The Daily Show & longstanding supporter of 9/11 survivors),JOHN FEAL (Founder of Feal Good Foundation and No Responders Left Behind), and JOSEPH MCKAY (New York City firefighter and 9/11 first responder)joined the fight.
On August 10, 2022, these five heroes watched as President Joe Biden signed the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act which will expand eligibility for VA health care and benefits for millions of veterans suffering from health issues because of exposure to burn pits and other toxins in war zones.
Please watch documentary trailer below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8SBFOUxE4c
But the PACT Act wouldn't have passed had it not been for the tireless work of these heroes.
Help us mobilize America once more and SIGN THE PETITION to get President Joe Biden to award each of them the Presidential Medal of Freedom!
Promoted by 15 supporters
0Supporters
Implement "Sarah's Law" for Stricter Accountability for Reckless Automobile Homicides
My sister Sarah was tragically killed on October 26, 2023 by a hit-and-run driver named DeAndrea Clark. Sarah was at the intersection of Kirby Parkway and 385 in Memphis, TN when she was killed. She was turning to get onto 385 when Deandre Clark ran the red light going 85 mph and hit her. DeAndrea fled the scene while Sarah trapped in her vehicle sit there dying, he didn't call 911 or try to do anything to assist her.DeAndrea was charged with the following: 1. Driving while license s/r/c. 2. Duty to give information or render aid. 3. Failure to exercise due care. 4. Leaving the scene of an accident involving death. 5. Vehicle Homicide and 6. Violation of financial law meaning he didn't have insurance.It took over a month for him to be arrested, one month and nine days to be exact when the Tennessee U.S. Marshal Service arrested him on December 5th, 2023, and despite his egregious actions,The Honorable Shelia Renfroe, (General Sessions Court Judge Division 9) on January 23, 2024 released him on his own recognizance until indictment in Criminal court. To this present day DeAndrea Clark remains free.This is not an isolated incident. In Tennessee alone, there were 1, 319 traffic fatalities in 2023 (source:TN Department of Homeland Security). Among these cases are numerous instances where suspects fled the scene or were released on their own recognizance or bail before trial. This lack of immediate accountability can encourage such reckless behavior and hinder justice.We propose "Sarah's Law", named after my sister whose life was cut short by such recklessness. This law will ensure that vehicle homicide suspects who flee the scene remain in custody until trial - no release on their own recognizance or eligibility for bail.By implementing this law we aim to discourage individuals from escaping responsibility for their actions while ensuring justice is served promptly and effectively. We believe that this will make our roads safer by sending a clear message about the severe consequences of reckless driving leading to loss of life.Please join us in advocating for "Sarah's Law". Your signature can help bring about this much-needed change to protect innocent lives on our roads from avoidable tragedies like what happened to Sarah. Sign this petition today!
Implement "Sarah's Law" for Stricter Accountability for Reckless Automobile Homicides
My sister Sarah was tragically killed on October 26, 2023 by a hit-and-run driver named DeAndrea Clark. Sarah was at the intersection of Kirby Parkway and 385 in Memphis, TN when she was killed. She was turning to get onto 385 when Deandre Clark ran the red light going 85 mph and hit her. DeAndrea fled the scene while Sarah trapped in her vehicle sit there dying, he didn't call 911 or try to do anything to assist her.
DeAndrea was charged with the following: 1. Driving while license s/r/c. 2. Duty to give information or render aid. 3. Failure to exercise due care. 4. Leaving the scene of an accident involving death. 5. Vehicle Homicide and 6. Violation of financial law meaning he didn't have insurance.
It took over a month for him to be arrested, one month and nine days to be exact when the Tennessee U.S. Marshal Service arrested him on December 5th, 2023, and despite his egregious actions,The Honorable Shelia Renfroe, (General Sessions Court Judge Division 9) on January 23, 2024 released him on his own recognizance until indictment in Criminal court. To this present day DeAndrea Clark remains free.
This is not an isolated incident. In Tennessee alone, there were 1, 319 traffic fatalities in 2023 (source:TN Department of Homeland Security). Among these cases are numerous instances where suspects fled the scene or were released on their own recognizance or bail before trial. This lack of immediate accountability can encourage such reckless behavior and hinder justice.
We propose "Sarah's Law", named after my sister whose life was cut short by such recklessness. This law will ensure that vehicle homicide suspects who flee the scene remain in custody until trial - no release on their own recognizance or eligibility for bail.By implementing this law we aim to discourage individuals from escaping responsibility for their actions while ensuring justice is served promptly and effectively. We believe that this will make our roads safer by sending a clear message about the severe consequences of reckless driving leading to loss of life.Please join us in advocating for "Sarah's Law". Your signature can help bring about this much-needed change to protect innocent lives on our roads from avoidable tragedies like what happened to Sarah. Sign this petition today!
Promoted by 56 supporters
0Supporters
Preserve Limekiln-Simmons for Educational Use and Protect the Simmons' Legacy
Property for education, public service, and the community’s honor are under threat in Horsham.Dorothea Simmons generously gifted a property, now known as Limekiln-Simmons, to the Hatboro-Horsham School District to support social good and education in our community.The intent of her donation was clear—that this property would be permanently dedicated to educational use.However, the Hatboro-Horsham School District has plans to sell this land to a developer who will turn it into a housing development, in a move that contradicts the gift's original intent of preserving open space and education. This proposed sale and repurposing of the space not only goes against the ethics of this gift but also compromises our community's values and quality of life.As an alternative to yet another housing development, a proactive group led by community-minded locals have proposed and lined up initial funding to turn this now-closed school and its associated 10-acre space into a nonprofit farming, food and sustainability school to benefit the community—an innovative idea that would provide unique learning opportunities. This is one fitting way of transforming Limekiln-Simmons into a unique educational environment that benefits the community without needing taxpayer funding.There is a SHORT TIME TO ACT: the Hatboro-Horsham School District currently has the opportunity to terminate, at no obligation, its initial agreement to sell the property for conversion to housing, but its time window to terminate its agreement without obligation is down to a matter of weeks.We believe it's essential to honor Dorothea Simmons' wishes and uphold ethical standards by keeping the property within its intended purpose—as a beacon of education and public good. We also believe that a new educational environment for Horsham will create a better future for the township’s residents than yet another housing development.Join our campaign today to secure a future that enriches our community and honors Dorothea Simmons' legacy.Please sign this Petition to urge the Hatboro-Horsham School District not to sell off our shared heritage but instead to embrace the future to create a new relevant educational experience in Horsham.In signing, you support your name being added to the following message to the Hatboro-Horsham School Board, Administration, and other relevant local representatives:Dear Hatboro Horsham Administration and Board,Please terminate the agreement to sell Limekiln-Simmons for conversion to housing now. This is an ethical issue of great importance. What you do reflects on the ethical values and impacts the resilience of our whole community and beyond. Please enable continued honoring of Dorothea Simmons’ gift as intended and allow the local community to continue to benefit from this educational space.Thank you.
Preserve Limekiln-Simmons for Educational Use and Protect the Simmons' Legacy
Property for education, public service, and the community’s honor are under threat in Horsham.
Dorothea Simmons generously gifted a property, now known as Limekiln-Simmons, to the Hatboro-Horsham School District to support social good and education in our community.
The intent of her donation was clear—that this property would be permanently dedicated to educational use.
However, the Hatboro-Horsham School District has plans to sell this land to a developer who will turn it into a housing development, in a move that contradicts the gift's original intent of preserving open space and education. This proposed sale and repurposing of the space not only goes against the ethics of this gift but also compromises our community's values and quality of life.
As an alternative to yet another housing development, a proactive group led by community-minded locals have proposed and lined up initial funding to turn this now-closed school and its associated 10-acre space into a nonprofit farming, food and sustainability school to benefit the community—an innovative idea that would provide unique learning opportunities. This is one fitting way of transforming Limekiln-Simmons into a unique educational environment that benefits the community without needing taxpayer funding.
There is a SHORT TIME TO ACT: the Hatboro-Horsham School District currently has the opportunity to terminate, at no obligation, its initial agreement to sell the property for conversion to housing, but its time window to terminate its agreement without obligation is down to a matter of weeks.
We believe it's essential to honor Dorothea Simmons' wishes and uphold ethical standards by keeping the property within its intended purpose—as a beacon of education and public good. We also believe that a new educational environment for Horsham will create a better future for the township’s residents than yet another housing development.
Join our campaign today to secure a future that enriches our community and honors Dorothea Simmons' legacy.
Please sign this Petition to urge the Hatboro-Horsham School District not to sell off our shared heritage but instead to embrace the future to create a new relevant educational experience in Horsham.
In signing, you support your name being added to the following message to the Hatboro-Horsham School Board, Administration, and other relevant local representatives:
Dear Hatboro Horsham Administration and Board,
Please terminate the agreement to sell Limekiln-Simmons for conversion to housing now. This is an ethical issue of great importance. What you do reflects on the ethical values and impacts the resilience of our whole community and beyond. Please enable continued honoring of Dorothea Simmons’ gift as intended and allow the local community to continue to benefit from this educational space.
Thank you.
Promoted by 43 supporters
0Supporters
Prevent the County Takeover and Privatization of Toms River Animal Shelter
I am a lifelong resident of Toms River, NJ, and have witnessed firsthand the remarkable progress our local animal shelter has made over the years. This progress is due to the tireless dedication and hard work of our shelter workers who devote their lives to caring for animals in need. However, our beloved local animal shelter is under threat. The Mayor of Toms River is considering allowing a county takeover or privatizing our Animal Control services. This could lead to significant changes that may negatively affect both the quality of care for animals and job security for dedicated staff members.According to data from other regions where similar changes have occurred, county takeovers often result in decreased funding per animal (American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals). Privatization can also lead to profit-driven decisions that prioritize cost-cutting over quality care (Humane Society United States).Our community deserves better than this. Our animals deserve better than this. We must stand together against these proposed changes and demand that control remains at a local level where it belongs.Sign this petition today if you believe in preserving the integrity and high-quality service provided by our local Toms River Animal Shelter.
Prevent the County Takeover and Privatization of Toms River Animal Shelter
I am a lifelong resident of Toms River, NJ, and have witnessed firsthand the remarkable progress our local animal shelter has made over the years. This progress is due to the tireless dedication and hard work of our shelter workers who devote their lives to caring for animals in need. However, our beloved local animal shelter is under threat. The Mayor of Toms River is considering allowing a county takeover or privatizing our Animal Control services. This could lead to significant changes that may negatively affect both the quality of care for animals and job security for dedicated staff members.According to data from other regions where similar changes have occurred, county takeovers often result in decreased funding per animal (American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals). Privatization can also lead to profit-driven decisions that prioritize cost-cutting over quality care (Humane Society United States).Our community deserves better than this. Our animals deserve better than this. We must stand together against these proposed changes and demand that control remains at a local level where it belongs.Sign this petition today if you believe in preserving the integrity and high-quality service provided by our local Toms River Animal Shelter.
Promoted by 57 supporters
0Supporters
Creation of an Independent Inspector General outside of the DoD
The DoD IG system consistently fails in its role to protect military members from reprisal and fails to impartially investigate complaint allegations which are brought forward at high risk by members of the DoD. Join us in demanding that the United States Congress disband the DoD IG and create a new Inspector General wholly independent from the Department of Defense.As advocates for service members who have served anywhere from 3 to 30+ years in the military, we’ve helped hundreds of people who have suffered from a corrupt, often apathetic, and sometimes even abusive Department of Defense Inspector General system.After over two years of advocacy for over 300 members of the DoD who are victims of numerous violations of federal law, DoD policy, and service regulations, we conclude the following:1. Personnel assigned to positions in IG billets are inadequately trained/equipped to carry out their duties,2. IGs within the DoD cannot exercise true independence since they are nearly always subordinate to the commander of the organization they oversee, and,3. Due to the low likelihood of success married with the high personal/professional risk a complainant assumes, there is veritably zero incentive to file an IG complaint.Not only are there no incentives to file IG complaints, in fact, the risks of seeking justice through the IG as currently organized as a subordinate element within the DoD far outweigh any potential benefits. These risks include reprisal and retaliation, ostracism, a total violation of one’s personal and professional privacy, isolation, embarrassment, and deteriorating physical and mental health.Because the body charged to inspect the DoD is a subordinate element in the DoD, perpetrators are not held accountable and, more importantly, no substantive recompense is afforded to victims. Even in the rare circ*mstances in which an allegation is substantiated, the amount of time required for that substantiation (in many cases, years after the offense) means that no meaningful recompense can be offered.United States Congress: We know you care about your uniformed Service Members; it is now time to demonstrate that care! No one who serves in the United States Military should fear to file a complaint if they have been a victim of a crime, harassment, bullying, abuse, etc.Sign now to demand that the United States Congress protect United States Service Members.
Creation of an Independent Inspector General outside of the DoD
The DoD IG system consistently fails in its role to protect military members from reprisal and fails to impartially investigate complaint allegations which are brought forward at high risk by members of the DoD. Join us in demanding that the United States Congress disband the DoD IG and create a new Inspector General wholly independent from the Department of Defense.
As advocates for service members who have served anywhere from 3 to 30+ years in the military, we’ve helped hundreds of people who have suffered from a corrupt, often apathetic, and sometimes even abusive Department of Defense Inspector General system.
After over two years of advocacy for over 300 members of the DoD who are victims of numerous violations of federal law, DoD policy, and service regulations, we conclude the following:
1. Personnel assigned to positions in IG billets are inadequately trained/equipped to carry out their duties,
2. IGs within the DoD cannot exercise true independence since they are nearly always subordinate to the commander of the organization they oversee, and,
3. Due to the low likelihood of success married with the high personal/professional risk a complainant assumes, there is veritably zero incentive to file an IG complaint.
Not only are there no incentives to file IG complaints, in fact, the risks of seeking justice through the IG as currently organized as a subordinate element within the DoD far outweigh any potential benefits. These risks include reprisal and retaliation, ostracism, a total violation of one’s personal and professional privacy, isolation, embarrassment, and deteriorating physical and mental health.
Because the body charged to inspect the DoD is a subordinate element in the DoD, perpetrators are not held accountable and, more importantly, no substantive recompense is afforded to victims. Even in the rare circ*mstances in which an allegation is substantiated, the amount of time required for that substantiation (in many cases, years after the offense) means that no meaningful recompense can be offered.
United States Congress: We know you care about your uniformed Service Members; it is now time to demonstrate that care! No one who serves in the United States Military should fear to file a complaint if they have been a victim of a crime, harassment, bullying, abuse, etc.
Sign now to demand that the United States Congress protect United States Service Members.
Promoted by 856 supporters
0Supporters
Regence: Don’t Deny Our Son's Right to a Better Future—Approve His Drug Treatment Now!
Our son Rocco is caught in a race against time. He is on the brink of losing access to a life-changing treatment for duch*enne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), a degenerative disorder that aggressively strips children of all muscle function, leading to wheelchair dependence and, tragically, an early death.Fortunately, there is hope for Rocco and other children fighting this relentless disease.ELEVIDYS, a recently FDA-approved gene therapy, offers a groundbreaking opportunity to dramatically improve Rocco's quality of life by facilitating the production of dystrophin, a protein crucial for muscle function that boys with DMD lack. This therapy could not only slow the damaging progression of the disease but also has the potential to preserve ambulation for a longer period and may extend life expectancy.This critical treatment is approved for children aged four to five, creating a narrow window for Rocco, who will turn six in October. The urgency to secure this gene therapy is twofold: the rapid progression of DMD makes early intervention crucial, and Rocco’s eligibility for ELEVIDYS is nearing expiration.Despite qualifying for ELEVIDYS, Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield (Regence) has denied coverage, which we view as indefensible, erroneously deeming the therapy ‘investigational’, despite FDA approval. We also believe that the cost of the drug is a factor in their decision. Even after our first appeal, Regence upheld their denial, further delaying this vital treatment.In our view, this decision by Regence is wrong.It appears to be a clear prioritization of profits over the ethical duty to provide necessary patient care.Labeling ELEVIDYS as 'investigational' seems to directly contradict its FDA approval and disregards the medical recommendation of Rocco’s doctor, undermining trust in and the purpose of our healthcare system.Furthermore, by limiting access to this FDA-approved treatment, Regence risks hindering scientific progress and marginalizes the efforts and sacrifices of those who participate in clinical trials to advance medical science.Decisions about patient care should be entrusted to medical professionals who are experts in their fields and understand the nuances of each patient, not to insurance companies.Rocco’s enduring cheerfulness and resilience brighten the lives of everyone around him. He deserves every chance to flourish without the shadow of DMD curtailing his dreams. The denial of coverage by Regence reflects a broader challenge that affects not only Rocco but all children who require access to innovative treatments.Through this petition, we urge our community and everyone who believes in medical equity to help persuade Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield to approve coverage of ELEVIDYS for Rocco. Moreover, we hope this will lead them to revise their policy on ELEVIDYS, ensuring that other qualifying children with duch*enne Muscular Dystrophy can also receive coverage without unnecessary hurdles. It’s time for Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield to stand with the medical community and the families they serve, supporting not just Rocco, but all children in need of this life-altering therapy.Join the fight for Rocco’s future by supporting this petition.
Regence: Don’t Deny Our Son's Right to a Better Future—Approve His Drug Treatment Now!
Our son Rocco is caught in a race against time.
He is on the brink of losing access to a life-changing treatment for duch*enne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), a degenerative disorder that aggressively strips children of all muscle function, leading to wheelchair dependence and, tragically, an early death.
Fortunately, there is hope for Rocco and other children fighting this relentless disease.
ELEVIDYS, a recently FDA-approved gene therapy, offers a groundbreaking opportunity to dramatically improve Rocco's quality of life by facilitating the production of dystrophin, a protein crucial for muscle function that boys with DMD lack. This therapy could not only slow the damaging progression of the disease but also has the potential to preserve ambulation for a longer period and may extend life expectancy.
This critical treatment is approved for children aged four to five, creating a narrow window for Rocco, who will turn six in October. The urgency to secure this gene therapy is twofold: the rapid progression of DMD makes early intervention crucial, and Rocco’s eligibility for ELEVIDYS is nearing expiration.
Despite qualifying for ELEVIDYS, Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield (Regence) has denied coverage, which we view as indefensible, erroneously deeming the therapy ‘investigational’, despite FDA approval. We also believe that the cost of the drug is a factor in their decision. Even after our first appeal, Regence upheld their denial, further delaying this vital treatment.
In our view, this decision by Regence is wrong.
It appears to be a clear prioritization of profits over the ethical duty to provide necessary patient care.
Labeling ELEVIDYS as 'investigational' seems to directly contradict its FDA approval and disregards the medical recommendation of Rocco’s doctor, undermining trust in and the purpose of our healthcare system.
Furthermore, by limiting access to this FDA-approved treatment, Regence risks hindering scientific progress and marginalizes the efforts and sacrifices of those who participate in clinical trials to advance medical science.
Decisions about patient care should be entrusted to medical professionals who are experts in their fields and understand the nuances of each patient, not to insurance companies.
Rocco’s enduring cheerfulness and resilience brighten the lives of everyone around him. He deserves every chance to flourish without the shadow of DMD curtailing his dreams. The denial of coverage by Regence reflects a broader challenge that affects not only Rocco but all children who require access to innovative treatments.
Through this petition, we urge our community and everyone who believes in medical equity to help persuade Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield to approve coverage of ELEVIDYS for Rocco. Moreover, we hope this will lead them to revise their policy on ELEVIDYS, ensuring that other qualifying children with duch*enne Muscular Dystrophy can also receive coverage without unnecessary hurdles. It’s time for Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield to stand with the medical community and the families they serve, supporting not just Rocco, but all children in need of this life-altering therapy.
Join the fight for Rocco’s future by supporting this petition.
Promoted by 1 supporter
0Supporters
Save DEATH BATTLE
I made this to help #SaveDEATHBATTLE! Please Join and take action to secure the future of DEATH BATTLE.DEATH BATTLE FOREVER!
Save DEATH BATTLE
I made this to help #SaveDEATHBATTLE! Please Join and take action to secure the future of DEATH BATTLE.
DEATH BATTLE FOREVER!
Promoted by 54 supporters
0Supporters
Demand Full Compensation for the Camp Fire Victims from PG&E and Fire Victims Trust
We, the victims of the devastating Camp Fire in Butte County, CA, bear daily reminders of our loss. Our once thriving community is now a scarred landscape. Every day we look out our windows or drive through our neighborhoods, we are forced to relive the horror of that fateful day. Some of us have lost a lifetime of memories; others have lost loved ones - both human and pets. For five long years, many among us have suffered without any help or compensation from Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and the Fire Victims Trust.The Camp Fire was California's deadliest wildfire, claiming 85 lives and destroying nearly 14,000 homes in November 2018 (source: CAL FIRE). Despite this catastrophic impact on our lives and livelihoods, PG&E has not fulfilled its promise to compensate us fully for our losses.We trusted those in charge to do what was morally right - to provide fair compensation so that we could rebuild our lives. Instead, we were met with unfair terms and conditions that further victimized us.This petition calls upon PG&E and the Fire Victims Trust to honor their commitment by paying out full compensations without imposing unjust terms. It's time they recognize their responsibility towards those affected by their negligence.We demand justice for all victims of the Camp Fire! Join us in this fight by signing this petition today!
Demand Full Compensation for the Camp Fire Victims from PG&E and Fire Victims Trust
We, the victims of the devastating Camp Fire in Butte County, CA, bear daily reminders of our loss. Our once thriving community is now a scarred landscape. Every day we look out our windows or drive through our neighborhoods, we are forced to relive the horror of that fateful day. Some of us have lost a lifetime of memories; others have lost loved ones - both human and pets. For five long years, many among us have suffered without any help or compensation from Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and the Fire Victims Trust.The Camp Fire was California's deadliest wildfire, claiming 85 lives and destroying nearly 14,000 homes in November 2018 (source: CAL FIRE). Despite this catastrophic impact on our lives and livelihoods, PG&E has not fulfilled its promise to compensate us fully for our losses.We trusted those in charge to do what was morally right - to provide fair compensation so that we could rebuild our lives. Instead, we were met with unfair terms and conditions that further victimized us.This petition calls upon PG&E and the Fire Victims Trust to honor their commitment by paying out full compensations without imposing unjust terms. It's time they recognize their responsibility towards those affected by their negligence.We demand justice for all victims of the Camp Fire! Join us in this fight by signing this petition today!
Promoted by 61 supporters
0Supporters
STOP THE SLABS AND TUNNEL PROJECT OVER WALDEN SQUARE ROAD
Successful, human-scaled, people-friendly housing projects are going up throughout Cambridge. Examples include Blanchard Road, Jefferson Park, Rindge Ave, and many, many more - all thoughtfully planned, designed and built on land that fits the developer's design. Winn's planned slab-and-tunnel project, however, is not only unreasonable, ill-conceived, awkward, ugly, and a recipe for a host of problems down the road. It's also too expensive.We advocate for more affordable housing. Who wouldn't? But ripping up a road, adding heat islands, destroying a mature canopy, and - worst of all - putting a road under a 9 story building resulting in a 250-foot tunnel is sheer folly - especially in an area frequented by hundreds of children and their parents.The problem: Privately owned Winn Development Corporation wants to build more industrial, oversizedslab-style housing. They plan to cover Walden Square Road with one very large building approximately 9 stories tall and 250 feet long that will destroy a family of seven beautiful, shade providing, cooling, mature trees running from the Yerxa underpass to the basketball court. The ground floor will be a covered parking lot / tunnel that will force foot traffic onto narrow walkways outside the slab. (See image: "proposed building A). Moreover, another new building next to the already immense #21 Walden Sq. Road will eliminate even more green space. (See image proposed building B.)The solution: Build elsewhere. Petitioners want WinnDevelopment to stop developing this poorly designed and unreasonably expensive project (funded in large part by the city) and focus instead on improving the structures currently in place at Walden Square. Moreover, we want all mature trees on Walden Square Road to be left untouched and the land they are on to be converted into a jointly owned municipal and private park.Why is this important?Ask anyone living at the Walden Square apartments how they feel about the construction of 2 large buildings and the addition of nearly 100 apartments smack in the middle of their only main thoroughfare and they will tell you it's a bad idea. Unfortunately, a very high percentage of Walden Square residents do not speak English and are largely unaware of Winn Development's plans.In public letter written by the mayor to the Cambridge Affordable Housing Trust conditions were identified stating that tenants at Walden Square have been subject to years of neglect and intimidation by Winn. Consequently, they have surrendered to Winn's plan not because they approve it but because they fear what the repercussions would be.It's important that we, as Cantabrigians living near and far from Walden Square support our multi-cultural, low income population.We advocate for: a) Winn's commitment to renovate all existing buildings, b) preserving Walden Square Road as an open air and accessible thoroughfare and c) leaving the mature greenery and tree canopy intact.Make no mistake: Winn's plan is for profits first, people second. Now is the time to tell this developer to build - yes - but build elsewhere.Thank you!
STOP THE SLABS AND TUNNEL PROJECT OVER WALDEN SQUARE ROAD
Successful, human-scaled, people-friendly housing projects are going up throughout Cambridge. Examples include Blanchard Road, Jefferson Park, Rindge Ave, and many, many more - all thoughtfully planned, designed and built on land that fits the developer's design. Winn's planned slab-and-tunnel project, however, is not only unreasonable, ill-conceived, awkward, ugly, and a recipe for a host of problems down the road. It's also too expensive.
We advocate for more affordable housing. Who wouldn't? But ripping up a road, adding heat islands, destroying a mature canopy, and - worst of all - putting a road under a 9 story building resulting in a 250-foot tunnel is sheer folly - especially in an area frequented by hundreds of children and their parents.
The problem: Privately owned Winn Development Corporation wants to build more industrial, oversizedslab-style housing. They plan to cover Walden Square Road with one very large building approximately 9 stories tall and 250 feet long that will destroy a family of seven beautiful, shade providing, cooling, mature trees running from the Yerxa underpass to the basketball court. The ground floor will be a covered parking lot / tunnel that will force foot traffic onto narrow walkways outside the slab. (See image: "proposed building A). Moreover, another new building next to the already immense #21 Walden Sq. Road will eliminate even more green space. (See image proposed building B.)
The solution: Build elsewhere. Petitioners want WinnDevelopment to stop developing this poorly designed and unreasonably expensive project (funded in large part by the city) and focus instead on improving the structures currently in place at Walden Square. Moreover, we want all mature trees on Walden Square Road to be left untouched and the land they are on to be converted into a jointly owned municipal and private park.
Why is this important?
Ask anyone living at the Walden Square apartments how they feel about the construction of 2 large buildings and the addition of nearly 100 apartments smack in the middle of their only main thoroughfare and they will tell you it's a bad idea. Unfortunately, a very high percentage of Walden Square residents do not speak English and are largely unaware of Winn Development's plans.
In public letter written by the mayor to the Cambridge Affordable Housing Trust conditions were identified stating that tenants at Walden Square have been subject to years of neglect and intimidation by Winn. Consequently, they have surrendered to Winn's plan not because they approve it but because they fear what the repercussions would be.
It's important that we, as Cantabrigians living near and far from Walden Square support our multi-cultural, low income population.
We advocate for: a) Winn's commitment to renovate all existing buildings, b) preserving Walden Square Road as an open air and accessible thoroughfare and c) leaving the mature greenery and tree canopy intact.
Make no mistake: Winn's plan is for profits first, people second. Now is the time to tell this developer to build - yes - but build elsewhere.
Thank you!
Promoted by 173 supporters
0Supporters
Support the Return of NYC Parkland – Remove the HERRC from Randall's Island Park!
Since August 2023, over eight (8) acres of NYC public parkland at Randall’s Island Park has been occupied by a Humanitarian Emergency Response and Relief Center (HERRC) to house ~3,000 migrants. The facility is built on four (4) highly used athletic fields that served thousands of NYC children each season.The fields were the most accessible and among the most popular fields at the park - representing 350,000 sq feet of opportunity for children all in need of a safe and open place to play. An estimated 8,000 playing hours will be lost this upcoming spring/summer if the facility remains. Behind every lost permit hour are hundreds of NYC kids missing out on the opportunity to be outside and play sports together.In addition to the loss of field space, the facility has brought other challenges. Located at the park’s most popular access point from Manhattan, the 103rd Street Footbridge, the facility has resulted in illegal mopeds speeding across the bridge, park pathways and even playing fields as well as into our neighboring community of East Harlem, putting pedestrians at risk. Precious picnic areas and passive parkland for recreational use, are no longer available. Furthermore, with limited City resources for the HERRC, park security and maintenance have been compromised due to violent crimes, illegal vending, littering, and camping.We empathize that the City is facing a crisis, but the use of NYC public parkland is not the answer. The use of Randall’s Island Park in this way, is not in the best interest of park patrons, local communities, or the migrants. It is not sustainable, nor is it safe or equitable, and the situation must change now.We call on Mayor Adams to remove the migrant facility from Randall’s Island Park.Parkland is precious and this is especially true in NYC where greenspace is limited. Randall's Island Park should be a place for the community to gather, children to play, and people to enjoy nature. It should be accessible and safe.Support the park and our community by signing this petition to remove the HERRC, which we will share with local city, state, and federal officials.Please note a confirmation email will be sent by change.org that must be confirmed to fully sign the petition.
Support the Return of NYC Parkland – Remove the HERRC from Randall's Island Park!
Since August 2023, over eight (8) acres of NYC public parkland at Randall’s Island Park has been occupied by a Humanitarian Emergency Response and Relief Center (HERRC) to house ~3,000 migrants. The facility is built on four (4) highly used athletic fields that served thousands of NYC children each season.
The fields were the most accessible and among the most popular fields at the park - representing 350,000 sq feet of opportunity for children all in need of a safe and open place to play. An estimated 8,000 playing hours will be lost this upcoming spring/summer if the facility remains. Behind every lost permit hour are hundreds of NYC kids missing out on the opportunity to be outside and play sports together.
In addition to the loss of field space, the facility has brought other challenges. Located at the park’s most popular access point from Manhattan, the 103rd Street Footbridge, the facility has resulted in illegal mopeds speeding across the bridge, park pathways and even playing fields as well as into our neighboring community of East Harlem, putting pedestrians at risk. Precious picnic areas and passive parkland for recreational use, are no longer available. Furthermore, with limited City resources for the HERRC, park security and maintenance have been compromised due to violent crimes, illegal vending, littering, and camping.
We empathize that the City is facing a crisis, but the use of NYC public parkland is not the answer. The use of Randall’s Island Park in this way, is not in the best interest of park patrons, local communities, or the migrants. It is not sustainable, nor is it safe or equitable, and the situation must change now.
We call on Mayor Adams to remove the migrant facility from Randall’s Island Park.
Parkland is precious and this is especially true in NYC where greenspace is limited. Randall's Island Park should be a place for the community to gather, children to play, and people to enjoy nature. It should be accessible and safe.
Support the park and our community by signing this petition to remove the HERRC, which we will share with local city, state, and federal officials.
Please note a confirmation email will be sent by change.org that must be confirmed to fully sign the petition.
Promoted by 12 supporters
0Supporters
Approve GS-441524 Drug for Feline Infectious Peritonitis Treatment
I am a cat owner, and like many others, my life has been touched by the devastating impact of Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP). This viral disease is caused by a mutation of the common feline coronavirus. Without treatment, it's incurable and 100% fatal.Gilead Sciences, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, invented and patented GS-441524 - a drug that could potentially save thousands - if not millions - of cats' lives every day. However, they have refused to license this drug for animal use due to fears that its similarity to Remdesivir could interfere with the human drug's FDA-approval process - originally intended for Ebola.This decision leaves countless cats at risk of losing their lives to an otherwise treatable disease. It is heartbreaking for cat owners like myself who are left feeling helpless as we watch our beloved pets suffer.We understand the importance of human healthcare but believe that animal health should not be compromised in this process. We urge Gilead Sciences Inc., to reconsider their stance on GS-441524.By approving this drug for veterinary use, we can give hope to hundreds of thousands of pet owners worldwide and save countless feline lives from FIP.Please sign this petition urging Gilead Sciences Inc., and the FDA to approve GS-441524 for animal use.
Approve GS-441524 Drug for Feline Infectious Peritonitis Treatment
I am a cat owner, and like many others, my life has been touched by the devastating impact of Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP). This viral disease is caused by a mutation of the common feline coronavirus. Without treatment, it's incurable and 100% fatal.
Gilead Sciences, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, invented and patented GS-441524 - a drug that could potentially save thousands - if not millions - of cats' lives every day. However, they have refused to license this drug for animal use due to fears that its similarity to Remdesivir could interfere with the human drug's FDA-approval process - originally intended for Ebola.
This decision leaves countless cats at risk of losing their lives to an otherwise treatable disease. It is heartbreaking for cat owners like myself who are left feeling helpless as we watch our beloved pets suffer.
We understand the importance of human healthcare but believe that animal health should not be compromised in this process. We urge Gilead Sciences Inc., to reconsider their stance on GS-441524.
By approving this drug for veterinary use, we can give hope to hundreds of thousands of pet owners worldwide and save countless feline lives from FIP.
Please sign this petition urging Gilead Sciences Inc., and the FDA to approve GS-441524 for animal use.
Promoted by 1 supporter
0Supporters
Save Retail Pharmacies
What are Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) and Why are they Forcing Independent Pharmacies to Close? Pass Senate bill 966 Now!It is time for California to require of PBMs the same transparency and fair business dealings required of every other business in healthcare. This petition is to tell the California legislature and the Governor that reform must happen now!SB 966 does the following:Prohibits steering patients to affiliated pharmacies and instead allows patients to choose which in-network pharmacy best meets their needs.Prohibits spread pricing, where PBM charges a plan a more for a drug than it pays a pharmacy.Requires that the PBM pass through all negotiated drug rebates to the payers or patients.Outlaws making any untrue, deceptive, or misleading statements.Prohibits PBMs from negotiating exclusive arrangements with manufacturers for drugs, devices, or other products.Limits how fees may be charged and requires transparency in fees.Independent pharmacies have long been pillars of community well-being, providing personalized care and essential services to neighborhoods across the nation. However, their existence is under threat, and the culprit is PBMs.PBMs work in shadows of healthcare, while you may never have heard of a PBM, they play a huge role in our healthcare system. PBMs control what medications you have access to, how much you will pay out of pocket for those medications and how much your community pharmacist will be reimbursed when they dispense those medications.It is an intentionally complicated and opaque business . . . a business that makes tens of billions of dollars in profit while claiming “PBMs are your advocates in the health care system, working to lower prescription drug costs for patients and payers.”Collectively, PBM profits increased 438%, from $6.3 billion in 2012 to $27.6 billion in 2022.Three of the largest PBMs Caremark/CVS, Optum and Express Scripts control almost 80% of the market. Just so happens, they also own pharmacies. Sounds like a conflict of interest and maybe why they are trying to squeeze independent community pharmacies.PBMs use several tactics to increase their profits while making it almost impossible for community pharmacies to remain in business:Clawbacks - One of the most egregious tactics employed by PBMs is their use of “clawbacks.” Historically, clawbacks occurred when a pharmacy would collect a copayment from a patient for a prescription drug, but the amount collected exceeds the pharmacy's reimbursem*nt from the insurance company or pharmacy benefit manager (PBM). However, PBMs are now routinely clawing back tens of thousands of dollars with no explanation as to why.Inadequate Reimbursem*nt – PBMs are reimbursing pharmacies far below their cost of acquisition which has severe and multifaceted negative impacts on pharmacies and their patients. For example, pharmacies are being reimbursed $360.70 below their acquisition cost for HIV medication and more than $1,323.62 below acquisition cost for drugs such as Humira which is used to treat arthritis. Nobody would expect any business to lose money on products they sell, yet independent pharmacies are doing just that, every day. That is not sustainable.Pharmacies purchase medications from wholesalers or manufacturers at a certain price, and if the reimbursem*nt from PBMs does not cover these costs, pharmacies face financial losses with each prescription filled. Over time, this will threaten the financial viability of the pharmacy and reduce the publics access to prescription medications.Patient Steering - Patient steering is a practice employed by PBMs that channels prescriptions to their own wholly owned retail, mail order or specialty pharmacies. Thereby diverting business away from independent pharmacies, depriving them of crucial revenue and patient volume. Not to mention, denying patients the right to receive their care from the community pharmacy of their choice.The consequences of these practices extend far beyond the pharmacy counter, reverberating throughout the communities they serve. As independent pharmacies are forced to close their doors, access to vital healthcare services diminishes, particularly in underserved rural and urban areas where independent pharmacies are often the only source of care.Ultimately, the survival of independent pharmacies is not just a matter of economics but a question of public health and community well-being. By confronting the predatory practices of PBMs and fighting to save independent pharmacies, we can work towards a future where access to quality care is a reality for all, not just a privilege for the few.California is lagging in addressing this crucial issue, every other state in the nation has taken action and it is time for California to act.Senator Scott Wiener is fighting this powerful conglomerate, he is carrying a bill to end these unfair business practices (SB 966) but we need to fight as well.The multi-billion-dollar corporations who are fighting Senator Wiener’s bill have the money; we have the people.Now is the time to tell the California Senate to pass SB 966 to ensure all Californians have continued access to prescription medications from their local pharmacy.
Save Retail Pharmacies
What are Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) and Why are they Forcing Independent Pharmacies to Close? Pass Senate bill 966 Now!
It is time for California to require of PBMs the same transparency and fair business dealings required of every other business in healthcare. This petition is to tell the California legislature and the Governor that reform must happen now!
SB 966 does the following:
Prohibits steering patients to affiliated pharmacies and instead allows patients to choose which in-network pharmacy best meets their needs.Prohibits spread pricing, where PBM charges a plan a more for a drug than it pays a pharmacy.Requires that the PBM pass through all negotiated drug rebates to the payers or patients.Outlaws making any untrue, deceptive, or misleading statements.Prohibits PBMs from negotiating exclusive arrangements with manufacturers for drugs, devices, or other products.Limits how fees may be charged and requires transparency in fees.
Independent pharmacies have long been pillars of community well-being, providing personalized care and essential services to neighborhoods across the nation. However, their existence is under threat, and the culprit is PBMs.
PBMs work in shadows of healthcare, while you may never have heard of a PBM, they play a huge role in our healthcare system. PBMs control what medications you have access to, how much you will pay out of pocket for those medications and how much your community pharmacist will be reimbursed when they dispense those medications.
It is an intentionally complicated and opaque business . . . a business that makes tens of billions of dollars in profit while claiming “PBMs are your advocates in the health care system, working to lower prescription drug costs for patients and payers.”
Collectively, PBM profits increased 438%, from $6.3 billion in 2012 to $27.6 billion in 2022.
Three of the largest PBMs Caremark/CVS, Optum and Express Scripts control almost 80% of the market. Just so happens, they also own pharmacies. Sounds like a conflict of interest and maybe why they are trying to squeeze independent community pharmacies.
PBMs use several tactics to increase their profits while making it almost impossible for community pharmacies to remain in business:
Clawbacks - One of the most egregious tactics employed by PBMs is their use of “clawbacks.” Historically, clawbacks occurred when a pharmacy would collect a copayment from a patient for a prescription drug, but the amount collected exceeds the pharmacy's reimbursem*nt from the insurance company or pharmacy benefit manager (PBM). However, PBMs are now routinely clawing back tens of thousands of dollars with no explanation as to why.
Inadequate Reimbursem*nt – PBMs are reimbursing pharmacies far below their cost of acquisition which has severe and multifaceted negative impacts on pharmacies and their patients. For example, pharmacies are being reimbursed $360.70 below their acquisition cost for HIV medication and more than $1,323.62 below acquisition cost for drugs such as Humira which is used to treat arthritis. Nobody would expect any business to lose money on products they sell, yet independent pharmacies are doing just that, every day. That is not sustainable.
Pharmacies purchase medications from wholesalers or manufacturers at a certain price, and if the reimbursem*nt from PBMs does not cover these costs, pharmacies face financial losses with each prescription filled. Over time, this will threaten the financial viability of the pharmacy and reduce the publics access to prescription medications.
Patient Steering - Patient steering is a practice employed by PBMs that channels prescriptions to their own wholly owned retail, mail order or specialty pharmacies. Thereby diverting business away from independent pharmacies, depriving them of crucial revenue and patient volume. Not to mention, denying patients the right to receive their care from the community pharmacy of their choice.
The consequences of these practices extend far beyond the pharmacy counter, reverberating throughout the communities they serve. As independent pharmacies are forced to close their doors, access to vital healthcare services diminishes, particularly in underserved rural and urban areas where independent pharmacies are often the only source of care.
Ultimately, the survival of independent pharmacies is not just a matter of economics but a question of public health and community well-being. By confronting the predatory practices of PBMs and fighting to save independent pharmacies, we can work towards a future where access to quality care is a reality for all, not just a privilege for the few.
California is lagging in addressing this crucial issue, every other state in the nation has taken action and it is time for California to act.
Senator Scott Wiener is fighting this powerful conglomerate, he is carrying a bill to end these unfair business practices (SB 966) but we need to fight as well.
The multi-billion-dollar corporations who are fighting Senator Wiener’s bill have the money; we have the people.
Now is the time to tell the California Senate to pass SB 966 to ensure all Californians have continued access to prescription medications from their local pharmacy.
Promoted by 32 supporters
0Supporters
Demand the Arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu for Alleged War Crimes
I am deeply disturbed by the actions of Benjamin Netanyahu, former Prime Minister of Israel, and his treatment towards Palestinians. His actions have been deemed immoral and even illegal by international standards. The United Nations has acknowledged these transgressions but has yet to take any substantial action. This is not just a political issue; it's a matter of basic human rights.According to Human Rights Watch, Israeli authorities are committing crimes against humanity in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (source: Human Rights Watch report, April 2021). These include unlawful killings, forced displacement of Palestinians, confiscation of land and property among others - all under Netanyahu's leadership.The International Criminal Court (ICC) has also opened an investigation into alleged war crimes in the Palestinian territories (source: ICC announcement March 2021). Despite this recognition at an international level, there seems to be little progress towards holding those responsible accountable.It is time for us to raise our voices against such atrocities. We must demand justice for victims and hold leaders like Netanyahu accountable for their actions. It is essential that we uphold international law and protect human rights everywhere.Please sign this petition demanding that Benjamin Netanyahu be arrested for alleged war crimes. Your signature can make a difference in this fight for justice and accountability.
Demand the Arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu for Alleged War Crimes
I am deeply disturbed by the actions of Benjamin Netanyahu, former Prime Minister of Israel, and his treatment towards Palestinians. His actions have been deemed immoral and even illegal by international standards. The United Nations has acknowledged these transgressions but has yet to take any substantial action. This is not just a political issue; it's a matter of basic human rights.According to Human Rights Watch, Israeli authorities are committing crimes against humanity in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (source: Human Rights Watch report, April 2021). These include unlawful killings, forced displacement of Palestinians, confiscation of land and property among others - all under Netanyahu's leadership.The International Criminal Court (ICC) has also opened an investigation into alleged war crimes in the Palestinian territories (source: ICC announcement March 2021). Despite this recognition at an international level, there seems to be little progress towards holding those responsible accountable.It is time for us to raise our voices against such atrocities. We must demand justice for victims and hold leaders like Netanyahu accountable for their actions. It is essential that we uphold international law and protect human rights everywhere.Please sign this petition demanding that Benjamin Netanyahu be arrested for alleged war crimes. Your signature can make a difference in this fight for justice and accountability.
Promoted by 19 supporters
0Supporters
Stop the Display of Anti-Israel Posters in MTA Subways and Busses
As a resident of New York, I am deeply disturbed by the inflammatory anti-Israel posters being displayed in our MTA subways and buses. These posters not only misrepresent facts but also incite violence against Jewish community. The content is designed to manipulate public opinion with misleading information, fostering an environment of hate, antisemitism, and tension between communities.These posters also reference and promote the BDS organization which is prohibited by law in the state of New York. This is a clear violation that cannot be overlooked.New York City prides itself on being a diverse melting pot where everyone should feel safe and respected regardless of their race or religion. However, these provocative posters are creating an atmosphere that contradicts this principle.As per FBI Hate Crime Statistics (2019), antisemitic incidents accounted for 60% of all religious-bias offenses - a figure that underlines the severity of this issue. We must take action now to prevent further escalation.We call upon the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to remove these inflammatory anti-Israel posters from our subways and buses immediately. By signing this petition, you are standing up against hate speech, violence, misinformation, and promoting peace within our community.
Stop the Display of Anti-Israel Posters in MTA Subways and Busses
As a resident of New York, I am deeply disturbed by the inflammatory anti-Israel posters being displayed in our MTA subways and buses. These posters not only misrepresent facts but also incite violence against Jewish community. The content is designed to manipulate public opinion with misleading information, fostering an environment of hate, antisemitism, and tension between communities.These posters also reference and promote the BDS organization which is prohibited by law in the state of New York. This is a clear violation that cannot be overlooked.New York City prides itself on being a diverse melting pot where everyone should feel safe and respected regardless of their race or religion. However, these provocative posters are creating an atmosphere that contradicts this principle.As per FBI Hate Crime Statistics (2019), antisemitic incidents accounted for 60% of all religious-bias offenses - a figure that underlines the severity of this issue. We must take action now to prevent further escalation.We call upon the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to remove these inflammatory anti-Israel posters from our subways and buses immediately. By signing this petition, you are standing up against hate speech, violence, misinformation, and promoting peace within our community.
Promoted by 45 supporters
0Supporters
Halt the Expansion of Basketball Court in Cow Harbor Park, Northport
I am a resident of the beautiful village of Northport, where Cow Harbor Park is an integral part of our community. This serene seaside park is where we walk our dogs, play with our children, sit and have coffee, eat lunch or just engage in friendly conversations. The tranquility and natural beauty it offers are invaluable to us.However, a plan to expand a basketball court threatens to disrupt this peace. Initially proposed as a private refurbishment project for the court, it has morphed into an expansion that will cut down trees and replace grass with concrete. This drastic alteration not only jeopardizes the natural charm of our park but also imposes financial burdens on taxpayers amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars.The consequences are far-reaching; this plan will change the face of our beloved park forever. While we understand and appreciate the need for recreational spaces like basketball courts within communities, there are numerous other locations within Northport that would be more suitable for such developments.We urge Huntington's local authorities to reconsider this decision and explore alternative sites for expanding athletic facilities without compromising Cow Harbor Park's unique character or burdening taxpayers unnecessarily.Please join us in preserving Cow Harbor Park by signing this petition against its unnecessary transformation into an athletic field.
Halt the Expansion of Basketball Court in Cow Harbor Park, Northport
I am a resident of the beautiful village of Northport, where Cow Harbor Park is an integral part of our community. This serene seaside park is where we walk our dogs, play with our children, sit and have coffee, eat lunch or just engage in friendly conversations. The tranquility and natural beauty it offers are invaluable to us.However, a plan to expand a basketball court threatens to disrupt this peace. Initially proposed as a private refurbishment project for the court, it has morphed into an expansion that will cut down trees and replace grass with concrete. This drastic alteration not only jeopardizes the natural charm of our park but also imposes financial burdens on taxpayers amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars.The consequences are far-reaching; this plan will change the face of our beloved park forever. While we understand and appreciate the need for recreational spaces like basketball courts within communities, there are numerous other locations within Northport that would be more suitable for such developments.We urge Huntington's local authorities to reconsider this decision and explore alternative sites for expanding athletic facilities without compromising Cow Harbor Park's unique character or burdening taxpayers unnecessarily.Please join us in preserving Cow Harbor Park by signing this petition against its unnecessary transformation into an athletic field.
Promoted by 8 supporters
0Supporters
Move the Construction of 150 Tiny Homes for Homeless out of Spring Valley
As a concerned resident of Spring Valley, I am deeply worried about the proposed construction of 150 tiny homes for the homeless off the 125 off-ramp and Jamacha Rd. This project is not just a matter of urban planning; it directly impacts our home values, our children's safety, neighborhood safety, and a direct threat to public health. Our neighborhood is home to several elementary schools, high schools, and daycares. Spring Valley is a low income community that cannot withstand 300 homeless. Who is going to maintain this when the funding runs out? It appears the proposed plan is for seven years. The 24 hour security and health needs- how long would that last? Will we the residents of the community have access to a special designated line to call 24 hours a day? Statistics show people with addictions, alcoholism, prostitution, disease and mental illness all follow these encampments. Balboa Park has had many of these issues and deaths. An unincorporated low-income community does not need nor want homeless added to a less fortunate community.Two encampments are planned for Spring Valley the 150 tiny camps and a lot on Bancroft. Both are in residential low-income areas. The Bancroft lot is close to Lamar Park a San Diego County park where the homeless are already camping with tents and the County hasn’t been able to control nor manage that situation with 1-3 tents. How are we to have confidence that the county will manage 300+ people.Trash, tagging and large garbage already line streets and the County seems not to care. Adding more will only drag Spring Valley down further. While we understand and empathize with the plight of homelessness, placing such a large-scale housing project in close proximity to our educational institutions raises serious concerns about safety and security. According to National Institute of Justice research, areas with high concentrations of homeless individuals often experience increased crime rates as previously stated (NIJ Research Brief). We are not against providing support for those less fortunate; however, we believe there must be a balance between compassion for the homeless and ensuring safety for our children, community and our property. We cannot try to raise others while bringing down our community that we work hard for. Sacrificing working people who struggle to pay for their homes to help the unhoused, who unfortunately come with the issues mentioned above is most unfair and unjust. Is it because we are unincorporated that there is lack of County empathy for us?We urge local authorities to reconsider the two proposed homeless encampments in Spring Valley or propose an alternative location that does not compromise all of us on the fore mentioned issues.The approved Jamacha Sleeping Cabins and Bancroft Safe Parking impose a great risk to our communities safety. The proposed budget, security, food for this homeless population will run out and Spring Valley can't take on this responsibly nor handle this situation. We are not the Government’s solution. We urge District Supervisors to reconsider and stop these plans. Please sign this petition if you share these concerns. Let's work together to keep Spring Valley safe and homeless encampment free while also supporting solutions that address homelessness responsibly.
Move the Construction of 150 Tiny Homes for Homeless out of Spring Valley
As a concerned resident of Spring Valley, I am deeply worried about the proposed construction of 150 tiny homes for the homeless off the 125 off-ramp and Jamacha Rd. This project is not just a matter of urban planning; it directly impacts our home values, our children's safety, neighborhood safety, and a direct threat to public health. Our neighborhood is home to several elementary schools, high schools, and daycares. Spring Valley is a low income community that cannot withstand 300 homeless. Who is going to maintain this when the funding runs out? It appears the proposed plan is for seven years. The 24 hour security and health needs- how long would that last? Will we the residents of the community have access to a special designated line to call 24 hours a day? Statistics show people with addictions, alcoholism, prostitution, disease and mental illness all follow these encampments. Balboa Park has had many of these issues and deaths. An unincorporated low-income community does not need nor want homeless added to a less fortunate community.
Two encampments are planned for Spring Valley the 150 tiny camps and a lot on Bancroft. Both are in residential low-income areas. The Bancroft lot is close to Lamar Park a San Diego County park where the homeless are already camping with tents and the County hasn’t been able to control nor manage that situation with 1-3 tents. How are we to have confidence that the county will manage 300+ people.
Trash, tagging and large garbage already line streets and the County seems not to care. Adding more will only drag Spring Valley down further. While we understand and empathize with the plight of homelessness, placing such a large-scale housing project in close proximity to our educational institutions raises serious concerns about safety and security. According to National Institute of Justice research, areas with high concentrations of homeless individuals often experience increased crime rates as previously stated (NIJ Research Brief). We are not against providing support for those less fortunate; however, we believe there must be a balance between compassion for the homeless and ensuring safety for our children, community and our property. We cannot try to raise others while bringing down our community that we work hard for. Sacrificing working people who struggle to pay for their homes to help the unhoused, who unfortunately come with the issues mentioned above is most unfair and unjust. Is it because we are unincorporated that there is lack of County empathy for us?
We urge local authorities to reconsider the two proposed homeless encampments in Spring Valley or propose an alternative location that does not compromise all of us on the fore mentioned issues.
The approved Jamacha Sleeping Cabins and Bancroft Safe Parking impose a great risk to our communities safety. The proposed budget, security, food for this homeless population will run out and Spring Valley can't take on this responsibly nor handle this situation. We are not the Government’s solution. We urge District Supervisors to reconsider and stop these plans. Please sign this petition if you share these concerns. Let's work together to keep Spring Valley safe and homeless encampment free while also supporting solutions that address homelessness responsibly.
Promoted by 90 supporters
0Supporters
Save Mamaw’s House from the Highway Expansion
This is my grandma’s house (Mamaw’s house). This is her story of how she is losing her home and land due to the expansion of the Mountain Parkway as told by my mom, Lanessa DeMarchis.She and my dad bought 63 acres on the Mountain Parkway in Salyersville, KY in 1969.They built this house in 1998.My dad passed away unexpectedly (in this house) in 2015.Mom has lived on this land for 55 years.55 years!?!?For the past 9 years, she has lived alone and taken care of this home. She is 76 years old.This home and the land surrounding it, is being taken away from her- due to the Mountain Parkway Expansion and eminent domain.She is losing everything.They are forcing her to move. They will bulldoze her house to the ground.This is the house we raised our kids in.This is the house where we hid Easter eggs, celebrated birthdays, Thanksgiving, and Christmas.This is the house where ALL of us escaped to -when life just got too complicated.This is where our kids ran barefoot and grew their own vegetables and caught lightening bugs.This is the house with a front porch swing, where very meaningful conversations took place.Yes, they are “buying” it from her.But, she doesn’t care about the money. She wants to live her remaining years in her home.We have tried EVERY option to prevent this from happening.Can you imagine this happening to your 76 year old widowed mom?They tell us they don’t have any option but to build this road straight through her home.I’m not an engineer, but I can’t help but wonder, “Really? No options?” with 63 acres to work with???Our family completely supports improvement for the people of eastern Kentucky.This is where we all grew up.We love this place.There’s nowhere like it, really.Honest, loving, genuine people. Hearts of gold. Strong communities.They deserve better roads and infrastructure.But, our mom/mamaw has become collateral damage in this process.It’s not fair.Please sign our petition to request that they either alter the plans to allow her to continue living in her home or to allow her to move her home to another place on her land.We would forever be grateful for your support.Here’s How to Support Our CampaignWe are encouraging everyone to use their voice to support my mom.Below you can find an email script to send to local and state representatives, as well as a script to call or leave a voicemail. We have found that a combination of both calling and emailing is the best way to ensure your opinion is being heard.Who to email: info@mtnparkway.comJohn.Blanton@lrc.ky.gov Brandon.Smith@lrc.ky.govJim.Gray@KY.govWhat to email: I am writing on behalf of Janet Arnett, homeowner of 2571 East Mountain Parkway, Salyersville KY 41465. While we support the development of transportation infrastructure, we believe it is wrong to offer no alternative to Janet to move her home or maintain part of her land. I am emailing to please ask that you consider an alternative option which allows her to stay in her home and maintain some of her land. She can be contacted at 260-415-6014 or at janetarnett@yahoo.com .Sincerely, Your NameWho to call:(502)564-5102 - Transportation Secretary Jim Gray(502) 564-2611 - Governor Andy Beshear(606)-666-8841 - The KY Department of Transportation(606)-436-4526- Senator Brandon Smith - Local Senator(606)-349-2409- The Mayor's office in Salyersville(502)-564-8100 - Representative John Blanton- Local RepresentativeWhat to say:Hello, my name is _____________. I am calling on behalf of Janet Arnett of 2571 East Mountain Parkway, Salyersville KY to lodge my dissent of her losing her home and land due to the expansion of the Mountain Parkway. I believe it is wrong to take away Janet’s home. I am calling to please ask that you consider an alternative option which allows her to stay in her home and maintain some of her land. She can be contacted at 260-415-6014 or at janetarnett@yahoo.com
Save Mamaw’s House from the Highway Expansion
This is my grandma’s house (Mamaw’s house). This is her story of how she is losing her home and land due to the expansion of the Mountain Parkway as told by my mom, Lanessa DeMarchis.
She and my dad bought 63 acres on the Mountain Parkway in Salyersville, KY in 1969.They built this house in 1998.My dad passed away unexpectedly (in this house) in 2015.Mom has lived on this land for 55 years.55 years!?!?For the past 9 years, she has lived alone and taken care of this home. She is 76 years old.This home and the land surrounding it, is being taken away from her- due to the Mountain Parkway Expansion and eminent domain.She is losing everything.They are forcing her to move. They will bulldoze her house to the ground.This is the house we raised our kids in.This is the house where we hid Easter eggs, celebrated birthdays, Thanksgiving, and Christmas.This is the house where ALL of us escaped to -when life just got too complicated.This is where our kids ran barefoot and grew their own vegetables and caught lightening bugs.This is the house with a front porch swing, where very meaningful conversations took place.
Yes, they are “buying” it from her.But, she doesn’t care about the money. She wants to live her remaining years in her home.We have tried EVERY option to prevent this from happening.Can you imagine this happening to your 76 year old widowed mom?They tell us they don’t have any option but to build this road straight through her home.I’m not an engineer, but I can’t help but wonder, “Really? No options?” with 63 acres to work with???
Our family completely supports improvement for the people of eastern Kentucky.This is where we all grew up.We love this place.There’s nowhere like it, really.Honest, loving, genuine people. Hearts of gold. Strong communities.They deserve better roads and infrastructure.But, our mom/mamaw has become collateral damage in this process.It’s not fair.
Please sign our petition to request that they either alter the plans to allow her to continue living in her home or to allow her to move her home to another place on her land.We would forever be grateful for your support.
Here’s How to Support Our Campaign
We are encouraging everyone to use their voice to support my mom.Below you can find an email script to send to local and state representatives, as well as a script to call or leave a voicemail. We have found that a combination of both calling and emailing is the best way to ensure your opinion is being heard.
Who to email: info@mtnparkway.comJohn.Blanton@lrc.ky.gov Brandon.Smith@lrc.ky.govJim.Gray@KY.gov
What to email: I am writing on behalf of Janet Arnett, homeowner of 2571 East Mountain Parkway, Salyersville KY 41465. While we support the development of transportation infrastructure, we believe it is wrong to offer no alternative to Janet to move her home or maintain part of her land. I am emailing to please ask that you consider an alternative option which allows her to stay in her home and maintain some of her land. She can be contacted at 260-415-6014 or at janetarnett@yahoo.com .
Sincerely, Your Name
Who to call:(502)564-5102 - Transportation Secretary Jim Gray(502) 564-2611 - Governor Andy Beshear(606)-666-8841 - The KY Department of Transportation(606)-436-4526- Senator Brandon Smith - Local Senator(606)-349-2409- The Mayor's office in Salyersville(502)-564-8100 - Representative John Blanton- Local Representative
What to say:Hello, my name is _____________. I am calling on behalf of Janet Arnett of 2571 East Mountain Parkway, Salyersville KY to lodge my dissent of her losing her home and land due to the expansion of the Mountain Parkway. I believe it is wrong to take away Janet’s home. I am calling to please ask that you consider an alternative option which allows her to stay in her home and maintain some of her land. She can be contacted at 260-415-6014 or at janetarnett@yahoo.com
Promoted by 5 supporters
0Supporters
The Resident Season 7 Renewal Hopes Dim
After six seasons, it appearsThe Residentis about to take its last breath.Although there has been no official decision yet, multiple sources confirm that the medical drama — recently noted by TVLine as one of 13 broadcast series with very uncertain futures — stands little chance of returning for a seventh season.“It’s essentially done,” aResidentinsider tells TVLine.The series’ fate appeared all but sealed last week when a Georgia-based estate sale purveyor announced that it would soon be hosting “a major network medical drama prop and liquidation” sale. The Resident shoots outside of Atlanta, and eagle-eyed fans recognized many of the props as belonging to the show.The Residentthis season averaged 4.4 million total viewers and a 0.5 demo rating (with Live+7 playback), down 10 and 29 percent from its Season 5 tallies. Out of the 15 scripted programs that Fox has thus far aired this TV season, it delivers the fourth-largest audience (trailing only the9-1-1s andAccused) but ties for No. 9 in the demo.
The Resident Season 7 Renewal Hopes Dim
After six seasons, it appearsThe Residentis about to take its last breath.
Although there has been no official decision yet, multiple sources confirm that the medical drama — recently noted by TVLine as one of 13 broadcast series with very uncertain futures — stands little chance of returning for a seventh season.
“It’s essentially done,” aResidentinsider tells TVLine.
The series’ fate appeared all but sealed last week when a Georgia-based estate sale purveyor announced that it would soon be hosting “a major network medical drama prop and liquidation” sale. The Resident shoots outside of Atlanta, and eagle-eyed fans recognized many of the props as belonging to the show.
The Residentthis season averaged 4.4 million total viewers and a 0.5 demo rating (with Live+7 playback), down 10 and 29 percent from its Season 5 tallies. Out of the 15 scripted programs that Fox has thus far aired this TV season, it delivers the fourth-largest audience (trailing only the9-1-1s andAccused) but ties for No. 9 in the demo.
Promoted by 2 supporters
0Supporters
OPPOSE THE CAVE SPRINGS/ROGERS LAND SWAP
Calling ALL Cave Springs and Rogers Residents to SIGN the Petition!The cities of Cave Springs and Rogers have approved ordinances to start the process of swapping land. Both cities are expected to hold public hearings in May followed by a final vote at their regularly scheduled Council Meetings in May. If approved, Cave Springs will detach land near Mt. Hebron Park that will immediately be annexed into Rogers. Rogers will simultaneously detach land west of Hwy 112 (which includes the Scissortail subdivision) that will immediately be annexed into Cave Springs. Many property owners from both cities are opposing this swap. We, the undersigned residents, strongly oppose the land swap and are advocating for a NO vote on the ordinance calling for the simultaneous detachment of land located in Cave Springs, Arkansas and annexation of land located in Rogers, Arkansas for the following reasons:1. The lack of transparency is ALARMING.Affected property owners never received notification that their property was included in the ordinance. Many learned of it through a local news story. Approving this land swap will set a dangerous precedent in which cities and developers can do as they please with private property.2. This is NOT the typical annexation process. The ordinance gives the City Council members the power to decide what will happen to the properties. The owners do NOT get to vote. This is fundamentally WRONG. A property owner's right to vote on something that directly involves his/her property SHOULD NOT be given to someone else.3. The cost incurred from this swap will be significant.Cave Springs will be required to provide water/sewer services to the annexed Scissortail subdivision within 5-7 years (assuming everything goes as planned). In order to do this, Cave Springs will have to extend its utility infrastructure to make the connection.As briefed at the April Cave Springs City Council Meeting, the estimated cost could be 11-12 million dollars. However, Cave Springs does not have the available funds so they will need to finance the bill. Based on estimated loan terms that were also briefed at the meeting, the total cost of the loan could be closer to 30 million dollars.Please realize that Scissortail ALREADY has utility services. If approved, Cave Springs taxpayers will be paying to provide service to an area that is not in need of services. Furthermore, if Cave Springs cannot make the connection within the required timeline, there is a lack of clarity of future imposed costs to the City and/or the actual property owners within Scissortail.4. Cave Springs’ current financial obligations are significant.Below are just a few examples to highlight the current financial situation. a. Cave Springs is currently renovating its Community Center and the project is running over budget. It is now estimated to cost closer to $1,000,000 and the project is still in its early stages.b. Cave Springs needs to purchase a Ladder Fire Truck. The estimated cost is $1,700,000. But again, the City needs to secure financing to pay this bill. The actual total cost is still unknown as the City has not yet secured financing.c. The Cave Springs water system is CURRENTLY LOSING significant amounts of water due to leaks (approx. 65% water loss). It was briefed at the April Council meeting that this is roughly costing $50,000-$60,000 per month. This is not a new problem. The city has been struggling with water loss for years. Yet the proposal is to install more water lines, taking time and resources away from fixing the current problems. 5. The proposed annexed land is NOT aligned with the City’s Vision Plan. In fact, it is in complete contradiction.With this swap, Cave Springs will be giving up two commercial properties and other prime real estate located near Mt. Hebron Park. The Cave Springs’ Vision Plan outlines 3 goals with very specific objectives in order to achieve the desired vision of the city. Furthermore, the plan states all 3 goals “emphasize the importance of maintaining the quality of a community over simply increasing the municipal population.”Goal 1: “Preserve the small town feel of Cave Springs while leveraging and integrating its historic core and natural resources into the future fabric of development.”Goal 2: “Focus on creating complete streets (complete streets include infrastructure for vehicles, bikes, pedestrians, public transit, and other), walkability, appropriate connections, and physical infrastructure (infrastructure constitutes a large number of items from streets and sidewalks, to water and sewer utilities) for existing and future development needs. Connect existing and identify new potential green spaces, recreational areas, water bodies and other natural resources to act as a network within the City as it grows and develops.”Goal 3: “Utilizing both current and future development patterns, plan for the growth of a diversified economic base of residential, commercial, office, restaurant, and retail business development in Cave Springs.”It is imperative that the community voice its opposition to this proposal through this petition and your support is greatly appreciated.Calling ALL Cave Springs and Rogers Residents to be present at the following:May 14th – Cave Springs City Council Work SessionMay 21st – Cave Springs Public HearingMay 28th – Cave Springs City Council MeetingImportant InformationRogers City Council Ordinance 24-17Cave Springs City Council Ordinance 2024-04Cave Springs City Council Meeting held on 4/23/24 in which public comments were made regarding the land swaphttps://youtu.be/YEbOUEmet6w?si=NxId3awhLT2JSCTDCave Springs City Council Members’ contact information can be found here:https://www.cavespringsar.gov/city-council
OPPOSE THE CAVE SPRINGS/ROGERS LAND SWAP
Calling ALL Cave Springs and Rogers Residents to SIGN the Petition!
The cities of Cave Springs and Rogers have approved ordinances to start the process of swapping land. Both cities are expected to hold public hearings in May followed by a final vote at their regularly scheduled Council Meetings in May. If approved, Cave Springs will detach land near Mt. Hebron Park that will immediately be annexed into Rogers. Rogers will simultaneously detach land west of Hwy 112 (which includes the Scissortail subdivision) that will immediately be annexed into Cave Springs. Many property owners from both cities are opposing this swap.
We, the undersigned residents, strongly oppose the land swap and are advocating for a NO vote on the ordinance calling for the simultaneous detachment of land located in Cave Springs, Arkansas and annexation of land located in Rogers, Arkansas for the following reasons:
1. The lack of transparency is ALARMING.
Affected property owners never received notification that their property was included in the ordinance. Many learned of it through a local news story. Approving this land swap will set a dangerous precedent in which cities and developers can do as they please with private property.
2. This is NOT the typical annexation process.
The ordinance gives the City Council members the power to decide what will happen to the properties. The owners do NOT get to vote. This is fundamentally WRONG. A property owner's right to vote on something that directly involves his/her property SHOULD NOT be given to someone else.
3. The cost incurred from this swap will be significant.
Cave Springs will be required to provide water/sewer services to the annexed Scissortail subdivision within 5-7 years (assuming everything goes as planned). In order to do this, Cave Springs will have to extend its utility infrastructure to make the connection.
As briefed at the April Cave Springs City Council Meeting, the estimated cost could be 11-12 million dollars. However, Cave Springs does not have the available funds so they will need to finance the bill. Based on estimated loan terms that were also briefed at the meeting, the total cost of the loan could be closer to 30 million dollars.
Please realize that Scissortail ALREADY has utility services. If approved, Cave Springs taxpayers will be paying to provide service to an area that is not in need of services. Furthermore, if Cave Springs cannot make the connection within the required timeline, there is a lack of clarity of future imposed costs to the City and/or the actual property owners within Scissortail.
4. Cave Springs’ current financial obligations are significant.
Below are just a few examples to highlight the current financial situation.
a. Cave Springs is currently renovating its Community Center and the project is running over budget. It is now estimated to cost closer to $1,000,000 and the project is still in its early stages.
b. Cave Springs needs to purchase a Ladder Fire Truck. The estimated cost is $1,700,000. But again, the City needs to secure financing to pay this bill. The actual total cost is still unknown as the City has not yet secured financing.
c. The Cave Springs water system is CURRENTLY LOSING significant amounts of water due to leaks (approx. 65% water loss). It was briefed at the April Council meeting that this is roughly costing $50,000-$60,000 per month. This is not a new problem. The city has been struggling with water loss for years. Yet the proposal is to install more water lines, taking time and resources away from fixing the current problems.
5. The proposed annexed land is NOT aligned with the City’s Vision Plan. In fact, it is in complete contradiction.
With this swap, Cave Springs will be giving up two commercial properties and other prime real estate located near Mt. Hebron Park.
The Cave Springs’ Vision Plan outlines 3 goals with very specific objectives in order to achieve the desired vision of the city. Furthermore, the plan states all 3 goals “emphasize the importance of maintaining the quality of a community over simply increasing the municipal population.”
Goal 1: “Preserve the small town feel of Cave Springs while leveraging and integrating its historic core and natural resources into the future fabric of development.”
Goal 2: “Focus on creating complete streets (complete streets include infrastructure for vehicles, bikes, pedestrians, public transit, and other), walkability, appropriate connections, and physical infrastructure (infrastructure constitutes a large number of items from streets and sidewalks, to water and sewer utilities) for existing and future development needs. Connect existing and identify new potential green spaces, recreational areas, water bodies and other natural resources to act as a network within the City as it grows and develops.”
Goal 3: “Utilizing both current and future development patterns, plan for the growth of a diversified economic base of residential, commercial, office, restaurant, and retail business development in Cave Springs.”
It is imperative that the community voice its opposition to this proposal through this petition and your support is greatly appreciated.
Calling ALL Cave Springs and Rogers Residents to be present at the following:
May 14th – Cave Springs City Council Work Session
May 21st – Cave Springs Public Hearing
May 28th – Cave Springs City Council Meeting
Important Information
Rogers City Council Ordinance 24-17
Cave Springs City Council Ordinance 2024-04
Cave Springs City Council Meeting held on 4/23/24 in which public comments were made regarding the land swap
https://youtu.be/YEbOUEmet6w?si=NxId3awhLT2JSCTD
Cave Springs City Council Members’ contact information can be found here:
https://www.cavespringsar.gov/city-council
Promoted by 44 supporters
0Supporters
Permit Dogs in Drinking Establishments Not Serving Food
As a business owner working tirelessly within the animal welfare sector to raise funds for local agencies in Reno, NV, I am deeply invested in creating a more inclusive environment for our four-legged friends. This petition seeks to allow dogs into drinking establishments that do not serve food.Currently, many of these establishments are off-limits to dogs due to outdated regulations. Most Establishments simply ignore the rules that are in place. However, numerous studies have shown that the presence of pets can significantly improve mental health and social interactions (source: American Psychological Association). Furthermore, there is no evidence suggesting that allowing dogs into such establishments poses any significant health or safety risk (source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).By signing this petition, you are supporting a move towards inclusivity and acceptance of our furry companions in more public spaces. You're also helping local businesses like mine who work closely with animal welfare organizations by providing them with additional opportunities for fundraising events and awareness campaigns.Let's make Reno a pioneer city in pet-friendly policies. Sign this petition today!
Permit Dogs in Drinking Establishments Not Serving Food
As a business owner working tirelessly within the animal welfare sector to raise funds for local agencies in Reno, NV, I am deeply invested in creating a more inclusive environment for our four-legged friends. This petition seeks to allow dogs into drinking establishments that do not serve food.Currently, many of these establishments are off-limits to dogs due to outdated regulations. Most Establishments simply ignore the rules that are in place. However, numerous studies have shown that the presence of pets can significantly improve mental health and social interactions (source: American Psychological Association). Furthermore, there is no evidence suggesting that allowing dogs into such establishments poses any significant health or safety risk (source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).By signing this petition, you are supporting a move towards inclusivity and acceptance of our furry companions in more public spaces. You're also helping local businesses like mine who work closely with animal welfare organizations by providing them with additional opportunities for fundraising events and awareness campaigns.Let's make Reno a pioneer city in pet-friendly policies. Sign this petition today!
Promoted by 11 supporters
0Supporters
Demand the Removal of Juab County EMS Director for Unprofessional Conduct
My name is Jared Williams, I am a Paramedic with Juab County EMS. I am writing this petition out of deep concern and personal experience, the current EMS director in Juab County, UT, has created a toxic work environment characterized by harassment, bullying culture, poor communication, and unsafe practices. Their leadership style is not only detrimental to employee morale but also poses a serious risk to patient safety.Countless employees have been subjected to her bullying tactics. They publicly shame trainees and employees in front of their peers - an act that fosters fear rather than growth or improvement. Furthermore, she refuses to develop written policies and procedures for employees to follow which creates confusion and inconsistency within our ranks.Their management style extends beyond just being unprofessional; it is dangerous. They encourage us to work outside our scope of practice against our licenses - a clear violation of professional standards that could potentially harm patients under our care.Moreover, they manipulate basic amenities like turning off the wifi during our 48-hour shifts - an action that not only affects morale but also hinders effective communication within the team.The lack of confidence in their leadership abilities is widespread among staff members who are increasingly concerned about their working conditions as well as patient safety.We believe it is time for change; we need a leader who promotes respect, open communication and safe practices while adhering strictly to professional standards. We call upon relevant authorities in Juab County to take immediate action by removing the director from their position as EMS director due to their inappropriate conduct and ineffective leadership style.Please sign this petition if you stand with us in demanding better working conditions for EMS workers in Juab County and improved patient care standards.
Demand the Removal of Juab County EMS Director for Unprofessional Conduct
My name is Jared Williams, I am a Paramedic with Juab County EMS. I am writing this petition out of deep concern and personal experience, the current EMS director in Juab County, UT, has created a toxic work environment characterized by harassment, bullying culture, poor communication, and unsafe practices. Their leadership style is not only detrimental to employee morale but also poses a serious risk to patient safety.Countless employees have been subjected to her bullying tactics. They publicly shame trainees and employees in front of their peers - an act that fosters fear rather than growth or improvement. Furthermore, she refuses to develop written policies and procedures for employees to follow which creates confusion and inconsistency within our ranks.Their management style extends beyond just being unprofessional; it is dangerous. They encourage us to work outside our scope of practice against our licenses - a clear violation of professional standards that could potentially harm patients under our care.Moreover, they manipulate basic amenities like turning off the wifi during our 48-hour shifts - an action that not only affects morale but also hinders effective communication within the team.The lack of confidence in their leadership abilities is widespread among staff members who are increasingly concerned about their working conditions as well as patient safety.We believe it is time for change; we need a leader who promotes respect, open communication and safe practices while adhering strictly to professional standards. We call upon relevant authorities in Juab County to take immediate action by removing the director from their position as EMS director due to their inappropriate conduct and ineffective leadership style.Please sign this petition if you stand with us in demanding better working conditions for EMS workers in Juab County and improved patient care standards.
Promoted by 115 supporters
0Supporters
No Dump in Woodinville!
Title: No Dump In Woodinville! Join the fight against moving the TransferStation to WoodinvilleThroughout the Northeast Recycling and Transfer Station (NERTS) sitingprocess, the residents of Woodinville, surrounding communities and Friends of Sammamish Valley have loudly and adamantly statedthat Woodinville is NOT the right location and it should remain and be improved at the existing location.This petition serves as a collective voice, amplifying our concernsand rallying our community to stand in solidarity against the buildingof a transfer station in Woodinville. The King County elected andappointed officials who will ultimately make the final siting decisionmust hear from those most impacted by this project.Why should you consider signing this petition? The Woodinville siteincludes the following flaws:1. Access to the site is unsafe and unable to accommodate majortruck traffic.2. Additional truck and personal vehicle traffic to alreadycongested roadways3. Proximity to a local school (directly across the street).4. The site includes sensitive wetlands that should remainprotected and undisturbed.5. Devastating impact to the robust local tourism economy.6. Existing and thriving businesses will be forced to close and/or relocate.7. Decreased air quality from increased truck traffic. Estimated 250,000 annual additional miles due to this move away from population centers.8. The proposed Woodinville site is not centrally located for theentire service area.9. Woodinville is already home to a commercial recycling transferstation, more than pulling our fair share for a city of our size.10. 430 to 870 metric tons annually of increased carbon due to longer trips to the proposed Woodinville location.11. Would do environmental damage to nearby Sammamish Valley farmland, watershed and open spaces Join us in telling King County that Woodinville should no longer beconsidered as a potential site for the new Transfer Station!King County Council Members contact information can be found here:https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/council/governance-leadership/county-council/councilmembers-districtsKing County Executives contact information can be found here:https://kingcounty.gov/en/legacy/elected/executive/constantine/contact.aspx
No Dump in Woodinville!
Title: No Dump In Woodinville! Join the fight against moving the TransferStation to Woodinville
Throughout the Northeast Recycling and Transfer Station (NERTS) sitingprocess, the residents of Woodinville, surrounding communities and Friends of Sammamish Valley have loudly and adamantly statedthat Woodinville is NOT the right location and it should remain and be improved at the existing location.
This petition serves as a collective voice, amplifying our concernsand rallying our community to stand in solidarity against the buildingof a transfer station in Woodinville. The King County elected andappointed officials who will ultimately make the final siting decisionmust hear from those most impacted by this project.
Why should you consider signing this petition? The Woodinville siteincludes the following flaws:
1. Access to the site is unsafe and unable to accommodate majortruck traffic.
2. Additional truck and personal vehicle traffic to alreadycongested roadways
3. Proximity to a local school (directly across the street).
4. The site includes sensitive wetlands that should remainprotected and undisturbed.
5. Devastating impact to the robust local tourism economy.
6. Existing and thriving businesses will be forced to close and/or relocate.
7. Decreased air quality from increased truck traffic. Estimated 250,000 annual additional miles due to this move away from population centers.
8. The proposed Woodinville site is not centrally located for theentire service area.
9. Woodinville is already home to a commercial recycling transferstation, more than pulling our fair share for a city of our size.
10. 430 to 870 metric tons annually of increased carbon due to longer trips to the proposed Woodinville location.
11. Would do environmental damage to nearby Sammamish Valley farmland, watershed and open spaces
Join us in telling King County that Woodinville should no longer beconsidered as a potential site for the new Transfer Station!
King County Council Members contact information can be found here:https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/council/governance-leadership/county-council/councilmembers-districts
King County Executives contact information can be found here:https://kingcounty.gov/en/legacy/elected/executive/constantine/contact.aspx
Promoted by 52 supporters
0Supporters
Reinstate Ed Johnson as Head Football Coach at Newberry High School
Ed Johnson has been a pillar of the Newberry High School community for many years. His dedication to his role as head football coach has had a profound impact on not just my boys, but countless students across the athletic department and school. His influence extends far beyond the football field, shaping young minds and fostering an environment of respect, discipline, and teamwork.Under Coach Johnson's leadership, our team has consistently performed well with numerous victories to its name. He is known for his ability to bring out the best in each player while instilling values that serve them well in life beyond high school.However, recent decisions by Alachua County School Board and Newberry High School have led to Coach Johnson's removal from his position. This decision was met with widespread disappointment from students, parents and community members alike who recognize the positive influence he brings.We believe that reinstating Ed Johnson as head football coach at Newberry High School is crucial for maintaining the strong sense of community spirit he fosters among our youth. We urge Alachua County School Board and Newberry High School administration to reconsider their decision.Please sign this petition if you support our cause – let's work together to bring back Coach Ed Johnson!
Reinstate Ed Johnson as Head Football Coach at Newberry High School
Ed Johnson has been a pillar of the Newberry High School community for many years. His dedication to his role as head football coach has had a profound impact on not just my boys, but countless students across the athletic department and school. His influence extends far beyond the football field, shaping young minds and fostering an environment of respect, discipline, and teamwork.Under Coach Johnson's leadership, our team has consistently performed well with numerous victories to its name. He is known for his ability to bring out the best in each player while instilling values that serve them well in life beyond high school.However, recent decisions by Alachua County School Board and Newberry High School have led to Coach Johnson's removal from his position. This decision was met with widespread disappointment from students, parents and community members alike who recognize the positive influence he brings.We believe that reinstating Ed Johnson as head football coach at Newberry High School is crucial for maintaining the strong sense of community spirit he fosters among our youth. We urge Alachua County School Board and Newberry High School administration to reconsider their decision.Please sign this petition if you support our cause – let's work together to bring back Coach Ed Johnson!
Promoted by 66 supporters
0Supporters
Make all health care facilities and services “fragrance free.”
One in three Americans are made ill by exposures to scented products of any kind and one in four is sickened by exposures to synthetic chemicals (Steinemann, 2018). Many of these individuals, including me, are not able to obtain access to adequate healthcare because of severe sensitivities and the fact that healthcare facilities and staff are very strongly scented with personal and cleaning products. Many staff are seriously affected also. Some have to leave their chosen profession because of exposures to chemicals and fragrances. Nurses are the highest risk group in America for developing this rapidly growing disability. Fragrance and chemically sensitive people now represent an underserved population that is invisible to most people. They suffer job loss, social isolation, stigma, dismissive doctors and many other losses. Chemical exposures (including to those found in scented products) have been linked to many chronic health conditions including cancer, asthma, autoimmune illnesses, dementia and other cognitive issues, lung disorders, endocrine gland disorders, autism and many others. No government agency regulates the vast majority of ingredients in scented products. Currently, healthcare facilities are not required to establish effective policies requiring their staff to be scent free, to replace all scented products with unscented ones, or to establish voluntary patient policies and education about the health risks of chemicals in scented products. I care about this issue not only because it affects me on a chronic basis but because it affected my husband who suffered for nine years from cancer of the immune system and was denied proper care because he was chemically sensitive. He was repeatedly made more ill because of staff who were wearing scented products, hospital beds with scented linens, scented hand sanitizers throughout the building, etc. Ultimately, he died not due to his cancer but because he was denied hospice care and medically urgent hospital care by staff who did not want to follow the weak, unenforceable fragrance policies in place. He was 55 years old.No one should be denied health care or made sicker trying to obtain care from a healthcare facility because the person has the disability of fragrance or chemical sensitivity. The government needs to take action because individual healthcare providers will not do so until they are forced to. They view this as a matter of personal choice much like the smoking issue was in an earlier age. Many want to do the right thing but don’t have a government agency backing them up.Please ask the secretary of HHS to provide leadership on addressing this issue and require all health care facilities and service providers to be scent free.
Make all health care facilities and services “fragrance free.”
One in three Americans are made ill by exposures to scented products of any kind and one in four is sickened by exposures to synthetic chemicals (Steinemann, 2018). Many of these individuals, including me, are not able to obtain access to adequate healthcare because of severe sensitivities and the fact that healthcare facilities and staff are very strongly scented with personal and cleaning products.
Many staff are seriously affected also. Some have to leave their chosen profession because of exposures to chemicals and fragrances. Nurses are the highest risk group in America for developing this rapidly growing disability.
Fragrance and chemically sensitive people now represent an underserved population that is invisible to most people. They suffer job loss, social isolation, stigma, dismissive doctors and many other losses.
Chemical exposures (including to those found in scented products) have been linked to many chronic health conditions including cancer, asthma, autoimmune illnesses, dementia and other cognitive issues, lung disorders, endocrine gland disorders, autism and many others. No government agency regulates the vast majority of ingredients in scented products.
Currently, healthcare facilities are not required to establish effective policies requiring their staff to be scent free, to replace all scented products with unscented ones, or to establish voluntary patient policies and education about the health risks of chemicals in scented products.
I care about this issue not only because it affects me on a chronic basis but because it affected my husband who suffered for nine years from cancer of the immune system and was denied proper care because he was chemically sensitive. He was repeatedly made more ill because of staff who were wearing scented products, hospital beds with scented linens, scented hand sanitizers throughout the building, etc. Ultimately, he died not due to his cancer but because he was denied hospice care and medically urgent hospital care by staff who did not want to follow the weak, unenforceable fragrance policies in place. He was 55 years old.
No one should be denied health care or made sicker trying to obtain care from a healthcare facility because the person has the disability of fragrance or chemical sensitivity. The government needs to take action because individual healthcare providers will not do so until they are forced to. They view this as a matter of personal choice much like the smoking issue was in an earlier age. Many want to do the right thing but don’t have a government agency backing them up.
Please ask the secretary of HHS to provide leadership on addressing this issue and require all health care facilities and service providers to be scent free.
Promoted by 8 supporters
0Supporters
Faculty and Staff Letter to NAU Admin
May 1, 2024President Cruz Rivera and the NAU Administration:In recent weeks, there has been increasing tension on college campuses around encampmentsprotesting Israeli use of violence against the Palestinian people. These demonstrations connectto a long and valuable tradition of student activism, from the protests of the Vietnam War to theprotests opposing Apartheid in South Africa. History has shown that these demonstrations andother student movements have been a wellspring for engagement among college students andhave played an essential role in the moral and ethical growth of the United States.On April 30th, the students of NAU joined this broader movement by setting up an encampmenton the lawn near the NAU bookstore. The day before the encampment, the University sent anemail stating that “expressive activities and temporary structures are prohibited on campusoutside of standard operating times of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.” This statement opened the door forNAU administration to justify using law enforcement. Indeed, this is exactly what occurred after10pm on April 30th, unfortunately transforming what was a peaceful, nonviolent protest into adestructive and harmful experience for all.As we have seen historically at Kent State and recently at Columbia, UT Austin, Cal Poly, andother universities, the use of police by university administrators has never led to a de-escalation.NAU is currently ranked as the university in Arizona with the highest “free speech” rating, andbringing in the police, arresting students, and/or punishing student protestors with suspensionsis a direct attack on the cherished value of free speech.As faculty, staff, and administrators, we aim to guide students in their intellectual, ethical, andspiritual journey of self-discovery and growth. For many of our students, this is part of thatmission. We affirm our students’ rights to free expression and peaceful assembly. We urge youto:● Stop arresting students in peaceful protest● Avoid punitive measures on protest organizers● Advocate for all students by protecting free speechPart of NAU’s vision is “to be the nation’s...premier driver of social impact.” Student-led protestshave historically driven social impact in this nation and around the world. Our students deservespace to voice their opinions peacefully and without fear of arrest or other repercussions to theireducational and career pathways.
Faculty and Staff Letter to NAU Admin
May 1, 2024
President Cruz Rivera and the NAU Administration:
In recent weeks, there has been increasing tension on college campuses around encampmentsprotesting Israeli use of violence against the Palestinian people. These demonstrations connectto a long and valuable tradition of student activism, from the protests of the Vietnam War to theprotests opposing Apartheid in South Africa. History has shown that these demonstrations andother student movements have been a wellspring for engagement among college students andhave played an essential role in the moral and ethical growth of the United States.
On April 30th, the students of NAU joined this broader movement by setting up an encampmenton the lawn near the NAU bookstore. The day before the encampment, the University sent anemail stating that “expressive activities and temporary structures are prohibited on campusoutside of standard operating times of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.” This statement opened the door forNAU administration to justify using law enforcement. Indeed, this is exactly what occurred after10pm on April 30th, unfortunately transforming what was a peaceful, nonviolent protest into adestructive and harmful experience for all.
As we have seen historically at Kent State and recently at Columbia, UT Austin, Cal Poly, andother universities, the use of police by university administrators has never led to a de-escalation.NAU is currently ranked as the university in Arizona with the highest “free speech” rating, andbringing in the police, arresting students, and/or punishing student protestors with suspensionsis a direct attack on the cherished value of free speech.
As faculty, staff, and administrators, we aim to guide students in their intellectual, ethical, andspiritual journey of self-discovery and growth. For many of our students, this is part of thatmission. We affirm our students’ rights to free expression and peaceful assembly. We urge youto:● Stop arresting students in peaceful protest● Avoid punitive measures on protest organizers● Advocate for all students by protecting free speech
Part of NAU’s vision is “to be the nation’s...premier driver of social impact.” Student-led protestshave historically driven social impact in this nation and around the world. Our students deservespace to voice their opinions peacefully and without fear of arrest or other repercussions to theireducational and career pathways.
Promoted by 76 supporters
0Supporters
Reinstate Rail Operator Aldo Viloria
March 13, 2024Mr. Sam DesueGeneral ManagerTriMet101 SW Main St., Suite 700Portland, OR 97204Dear Sam,We, the undersigned, are convinced the decision to terminate Mr. Aldo Viloria, #8541, the Operator involved in the unfortunate fatal incident at Beaverton Transit Center on December 21, 2023, is misguided and unjustified.With respect and condolences to the deceased and his loved ones, a chain of events allowed the tragedy to unfold. If they played out differently, it might not have happened. Within that sequence of events, Mr. Viloria had no reasonable opportunity to prevent it.The Accident Review Board determined it to be a non-preventable accident (NPA). As such, Mr. Viloria should not face any disciplinary action from TriMet. The decision to terminate him is unprecedented.We believe the organization is allowing confirmation bias to drive the disciplinary process, whereby if someone dies, someone has to be fired. The facts of the case are not that simple, and do not warrant the severe disciplinary action Mr. Viloria is facing. Further, we are concerned terminating Mr. Viloria is a public admission of fault, exposing TriMet to current and future liability.When you say you believe in the people at TriMet, desire a safer and more supportive work environment, and a better employee experience, we believe you. We therefore ask you to support justice in the workplace, a full and objective evaluation of all the facts, and allow the facts to lead TriMet to the right conclusion.We all know it could have been any one of us operating the train on that fateful day. If you were a Train Operator, Mr. Desue, it could have been you.We implore you to review this case and explain to us why you can or cannot support reinstating Mr. Viloria after being made aware of all the relevant facts.Sincerely yours,(See attached pages)
Reinstate Rail Operator Aldo Viloria
March 13, 2024
Mr. Sam Desue
General Manager
TriMet
101 SW Main St., Suite 700Portland, OR 97204
Dear Sam,
We, the undersigned, are convinced the decision to terminate Mr. Aldo Viloria, #8541, the Operator involved in the unfortunate fatal incident at Beaverton Transit Center on December 21, 2023, is misguided and unjustified.
With respect and condolences to the deceased and his loved ones, a chain of events allowed the tragedy to unfold. If they played out differently, it might not have happened. Within that sequence of events, Mr. Viloria had no reasonable opportunity to prevent it.
The Accident Review Board determined it to be a non-preventable accident (NPA). As such, Mr. Viloria should not face any disciplinary action from TriMet. The decision to terminate him is unprecedented.
We believe the organization is allowing confirmation bias to drive the disciplinary process, whereby if someone dies, someone has to be fired. The facts of the case are not that simple, and do not warrant the severe disciplinary action Mr. Viloria is facing.
Further, we are concerned terminating Mr. Viloria is a public admission of fault, exposing TriMet to current and future liability.
When you say you believe in the people at TriMet, desire a safer and more supportive work environment, and a better employee experience, we believe you. We therefore ask you to support justice in the workplace, a full and objective evaluation of all the facts, and allow the facts to lead TriMet to the right conclusion.
We all know it could have been any one of us operating the train on that fateful day. If you were a Train Operator, Mr. Desue, it could have been you.
We implore you to review this case and explain to us why you can or cannot support reinstating Mr. Viloria after being made aware of all the relevant facts.
Sincerely yours,
(See attached pages)
Promoted by 88 supporters
0Supporters
Build the Kern Gateway Trail!
US Forest Service, Bakersfield City Council and staff, and Kern County Board of Supervisors and staff,The Kern River canyon is one of the scenic gems of California. It opens a grandiose channel between the expanse of the San Joaquin Valley floor and the towering heights of the Southern Sierra Nevada. As one of America's Wild and Scenic Rivers, the Kern River is known for it's recreation, beauty, and it's diversity of landscapes and ecosystems.Unfortunately, though, the lower, most scenic and most easily reached stretch of the Kern River Canyon is inaccessible for recreation. There are no official hiking trails for the first 20 miles of canyon, forcing visitors and nearby residents to drive significantly further to access less unique and stunning sections of the canyon (i.e. Mill Creek Trail, Remington Ridge Trail, Kern Canyon Trail). To enjoy the lowest stretches of the canyon, visitors must do so from the seat of a car, with limited places to stop and leave the car to safely enjoy the scenery. Although many sections of well developed trails line the canyon walls on the south side of the river, these were made by Southern California Edison for their hydro plant infrastructure and are not officially open as a USFS trail.This is an issue for the nearly 500,000 people living in Kern County's largest city and California's 9th largest city, Bakersfield. These residents should have improved access to outdoor recreation on public lands. The edge of Sequoia National Forest is only 20 mins away from downtown Bakersfield and a short distance in from the mouth of the canyon, yet few residents realize or take advantage of their access to this USFS managed "land of many uses." Additionally, over 20,000 people live in small towns and rural areas of the Kern River Valley. These residents would also benefit from a landmark trail such as what should exist at the canyon mouth, both from using it themselves and also economically from additional tourism attracted by a spectacular trail network.This petition is also directed at Kern County and Bakersfield City officials, who have a vested interest in creating unique quality of life amenities for residents to enjoy. The Jar Trail, a trail at the gateway to the Kern Canyon, used to be the most scenic, easily accessed trail to Bakersfield. It passes through several parcels of privately held land as it climbs the ridge above the canyon mouth. It was closed by these landowners due to management and liability concerns, as well as a lack of safe parking access along Highway 178. County and City leaders should allocate resources to reopen access to this trail and to work with USFS to develop a larger network of trails up into the canyon. USFS may require resources from the county and city to make the trail system viable, and it's in the best interest of the County and City to support USFS however is necessary to make the trail a reality.Having a trail in this scenic section of river canyon will create a noteworthy regional landmark that will instill pride in residents, improve their quality of life, and attract visitors from across the state to enjoy it.Please note that the Jar Trail is closed to public access. Do not trespass on the private property at the mouth of the canyon. Improper use led to its closure and continued problems from unwanted visitors may harm ongoing efforts to reopen the trail.To support this project, go to https://linktr.ee/kerngatewaytrail Follow us on social media platforms, sign up for email updates, and learn about future events on our website. If you'd like to make a donation to support this project, please do so at www.kernriverparkway.org/donate. It can be put to better use through the sponsoring non-profit than through change.org paid promotion, which is poorly targeted and comes at a very high cost for each additional signature.
Build the Kern Gateway Trail!
US Forest Service, Bakersfield City Council and staff, and Kern County Board of Supervisors and staff,
The Kern River canyon is one of the scenic gems of California. It opens a grandiose channel between the expanse of the San Joaquin Valley floor and the towering heights of the Southern Sierra Nevada. As one of America's Wild and Scenic Rivers, the Kern River is known for it's recreation, beauty, and it's diversity of landscapes and ecosystems.
Unfortunately, though, the lower, most scenic and most easily reached stretch of the Kern River Canyon is inaccessible for recreation. There are no official hiking trails for the first 20 miles of canyon, forcing visitors and nearby residents to drive significantly further to access less unique and stunning sections of the canyon (i.e. Mill Creek Trail, Remington Ridge Trail, Kern Canyon Trail). To enjoy the lowest stretches of the canyon, visitors must do so from the seat of a car, with limited places to stop and leave the car to safely enjoy the scenery. Although many sections of well developed trails line the canyon walls on the south side of the river, these were made by Southern California Edison for their hydro plant infrastructure and are not officially open as a USFS trail.
This is an issue for the nearly 500,000 people living in Kern County's largest city and California's 9th largest city, Bakersfield. These residents should have improved access to outdoor recreation on public lands. The edge of Sequoia National Forest is only 20 mins away from downtown Bakersfield and a short distance in from the mouth of the canyon, yet few residents realize or take advantage of their access to this USFS managed "land of many uses." Additionally, over 20,000 people live in small towns and rural areas of the Kern River Valley. These residents would also benefit from a landmark trail such as what should exist at the canyon mouth, both from using it themselves and also economically from additional tourism attracted by a spectacular trail network.
This petition is also directed at Kern County and Bakersfield City officials, who have a vested interest in creating unique quality of life amenities for residents to enjoy. The Jar Trail, a trail at the gateway to the Kern Canyon, used to be the most scenic, easily accessed trail to Bakersfield. It passes through several parcels of privately held land as it climbs the ridge above the canyon mouth. It was closed by these landowners due to management and liability concerns, as well as a lack of safe parking access along Highway 178. County and City leaders should allocate resources to reopen access to this trail and to work with USFS to develop a larger network of trails up into the canyon. USFS may require resources from the county and city to make the trail system viable, and it's in the best interest of the County and City to support USFS however is necessary to make the trail a reality.
Having a trail in this scenic section of river canyon will create a noteworthy regional landmark that will instill pride in residents, improve their quality of life, and attract visitors from across the state to enjoy it.
Please note that the Jar Trail is closed to public access. Do not trespass on the private property at the mouth of the canyon. Improper use led to its closure and continued problems from unwanted visitors may harm ongoing efforts to reopen the trail.
To support this project, go to https://linktr.ee/kerngatewaytrail Follow us on social media platforms, sign up for email updates, and learn about future events on our website. If you'd like to make a donation to support this project, please do so at www.kernriverparkway.org/donate. It can be put to better use through the sponsoring non-profit than through change.org paid promotion, which is poorly targeted and comes at a very high cost for each additional signature.
Promoted by 108 supporters
0Supporters
Stop the Hunter Tier Housing Project in Mamaroneck
This petition aims to record the objections to the proposed Hunter Affordable Housing.Top Concerns1) Focus On Flooding - Flood Mitigation has been a major concern of village residents for years. This need to be prioritized over a new development targeting non-residents.2) Emergency and Other Critical Services - Fire, Police, Post Office and EMS have voiced concerns: they do not have the resources for more residents and the location of this development could impact access for emergency services.3) Parking - This project will significantly reduce the number of public parking spots available to residents and patrons supporting the businesses on the avenue.4) Schools – The schools are already over capacity. School budgets, classroom sizes, and teachers are not prepared to take on an additional influx of students.5) Traffic – Traffic is already congested due to the proximity to the Avenue and Boston Post Road as well as traffic related to the police, fire, Emelin Theatre, municipal buildings, and post office. The traffic at this location during commuting hours will come to a standstill.6) Process - The process is extremely concerning. The RFP process was a blank slate so developers could share their visions, unconstrained by any concerns for the village or town.No impact studies addressing the basic concerns outlined above have been made generally available.There is no transparency into the economics for this development: how much is the developer paying for this land? How much will be collected in taxes from the new residents?The Village has no professional representation to evaluate the best use for this property which has been a point of disagreement between Sharon Torres (village mayor), Nora Lucas (deputy village mayor), and the Village attorney, on the one hand, and the three other members of the board of trustees, on the other, including Lou Young who stated that he is ready to vote on this matter now. Additionally, when the library was built, a detailed and thoughtful RFP was put together in collaboration with the community, resulting in 14 competitive bids. The board has fast tracked Hunter without a thoughtful process, resulting in just two bids and very concerned residents.7) Conflict of Interest -There are number of conflicts of interest.One of the three members of the Board of Trustees who is in favor of the development (Manny Rawlings) was a defendant in a landlord and tenant lawsuit filed by the favored bidder (Washingtonville Housing Alliance, who submitted a proposal with Westhab, Inc) and has been ordered by the judgeto pay to Washingtonville Housing Alliance the amounts due.A second member of the Board of Trustees (Leilani Yizar-Reid) stated at the March 24 Board of Trustee Meeting(starting at 1:02:15): "I cannot afford to live here. I will benefit from greatly from living in that place. Me. So how will it benefit people? It will benefit me."All conflicted members of the board who may gain personally should not vote. They should not be acting in their own interests.8) Economic Impact - With no clear evidence of any revenue streams (including from the disposition of the land, or on an ongoing basis, from taxes collected from the development), many homeowners are concerned that their taxes will increase to foot the costs to expand our infrastructure to accommodate these new residents. In the short term, with a stretched infrastructure and lowering school test scores, the value of our homes will decrease.9) Who Gets to Live at Hunter Tier – Mamaroneck residents are being misled about the eligibility rules for these units. The housing will be available on a LOTTERY BASIS to people meeting the financial criteria (which ranges from 30% AMI to 120% AMI with the Area Median Income (AMI) for all of Westchester County being $146,800) and who currently live in the 9 county area including Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, and Fairfield Counties and all five boroughs of New York City. Residents of Mamaroneck will NOT be prioritized.10) Need for Affordable Housing - We meet the requirements for affordable housing; this is not a necessity. Given the other issues and concerns, this should not be a priority of the board of trustees.11) Mandate of the Board - According to the general power granted to the village board of trustees, under section 4–412 of the New York State Village law, their powers should be exercised for what is deemed expedient or desirable for, among other things: "the safety, health, comfort, and general welfare of its inhabitants [and] the protection of their property". Given the cost and the compromise to infrastructure, this development offers no benefit to any homeowner in Mamaroneck; there is also no benefit to any person renting in Mamaroneck unless that person wins the lottery for a new home in this development and so to push this project seems outside of the mandate of the board.In conclusion, who does this project benefit? Based on the information available, we lose a valuable asset, we over-burden the infrastructure (including schools as well as emergency and other critical services), we lose parking, we increase tax-payer costs and we decrease home values all the while whilst disregarding current concerns of the residents of Mamaroneck (including flooding and poor existing infrastructure). As residents of Mamaroneck, we demand this project be put aside until a more thoughtful approach can be taken in collaboration with the community.Please sign this petition if you share these views.
Stop the Hunter Tier Housing Project in Mamaroneck
This petition aims to record the objections to the proposed Hunter Affordable Housing.
Top Concerns
1) Focus On Flooding - Flood Mitigation has been a major concern of village residents for years. This need to be prioritized over a new development targeting non-residents.
2) Emergency and Other Critical Services - Fire, Police, Post Office and EMS have voiced concerns: they do not have the resources for more residents and the location of this development could impact access for emergency services.
3) Parking - This project will significantly reduce the number of public parking spots available to residents and patrons supporting the businesses on the avenue.
4) Schools – The schools are already over capacity. School budgets, classroom sizes, and teachers are not prepared to take on an additional influx of students.
5) Traffic – Traffic is already congested due to the proximity to the Avenue and Boston Post Road as well as traffic related to the police, fire, Emelin Theatre, municipal buildings, and post office. The traffic at this location during commuting hours will come to a standstill.
6) Process - The process is extremely concerning. The RFP process was a blank slate so developers could share their visions, unconstrained by any concerns for the village or town.
No impact studies addressing the basic concerns outlined above have been made generally available.
There is no transparency into the economics for this development: how much is the developer paying for this land? How much will be collected in taxes from the new residents?
The Village has no professional representation to evaluate the best use for this property which has been a point of disagreement between Sharon Torres (village mayor), Nora Lucas (deputy village mayor), and the Village attorney, on the one hand, and the three other members of the board of trustees, on the other, including Lou Young who stated that he is ready to vote on this matter now.
Additionally, when the library was built, a detailed and thoughtful RFP was put together in collaboration with the community, resulting in 14 competitive bids. The board has fast tracked Hunter without a thoughtful process, resulting in just two bids and very concerned residents.
7) Conflict of Interest -There are number of conflicts of interest.
One of the three members of the Board of Trustees who is in favor of the development (Manny Rawlings) was a defendant in a landlord and tenant lawsuit filed by the favored bidder (Washingtonville Housing Alliance, who submitted a proposal with Westhab, Inc) and has been ordered by the judgeto pay to Washingtonville Housing Alliance the amounts due.
A second member of the Board of Trustees (Leilani Yizar-Reid) stated at the March 24 Board of Trustee Meeting(starting at 1:02:15): "I cannot afford to live here. I will benefit from greatly from living in that place. Me. So how will it benefit people? It will benefit me."
All conflicted members of the board who may gain personally should not vote. They should not be acting in their own interests.
8) Economic Impact - With no clear evidence of any revenue streams (including from the disposition of the land, or on an ongoing basis, from taxes collected from the development), many homeowners are concerned that their taxes will increase to foot the costs to expand our infrastructure to accommodate these new residents. In the short term, with a stretched infrastructure and lowering school test scores, the value of our homes will decrease.
9) Who Gets to Live at Hunter Tier – Mamaroneck residents are being misled about the eligibility rules for these units. The housing will be available on a LOTTERY BASIS to people meeting the financial criteria (which ranges from 30% AMI to 120% AMI with the Area Median Income (AMI) for all of Westchester County being $146,800) and who currently live in the 9 county area including Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, and Fairfield Counties and all five boroughs of New York City. Residents of Mamaroneck will NOT be prioritized.
10) Need for Affordable Housing - We meet the requirements for affordable housing; this is not a necessity. Given the other issues and concerns, this should not be a priority of the board of trustees.
11) Mandate of the Board - According to the general power granted to the village board of trustees, under section 4–412 of the New York State Village law, their powers should be exercised for what is deemed expedient or desirable for, among other things: "the safety, health, comfort, and general welfare of its inhabitants [and] the protection of their property". Given the cost and the compromise to infrastructure, this development offers no benefit to any homeowner in Mamaroneck; there is also no benefit to any person renting in Mamaroneck unless that person wins the lottery for a new home in this development and so to push this project seems outside of the mandate of the board.
In conclusion, who does this project benefit? Based on the information available, we lose a valuable asset, we over-burden the infrastructure (including schools as well as emergency and other critical services), we lose parking, we increase tax-payer costs and we decrease home values all the while whilst disregarding current concerns of the residents of Mamaroneck (including flooding and poor existing infrastructure). As residents of Mamaroneck, we demand this project be put aside until a more thoughtful approach can be taken in collaboration with the community.
Please sign this petition if you share these views.
Promoted by 71 supporters
0Supporters
Save the Humanities at Valparaiso University
On March 1, 2024, the leadership of Valparaiso University announced that nearly 30 undergraduate major, minor and certificate programs, staffed by faculty in over 15 disciplines, had been placed under review for discontinuance. This announcement was made after VU leadership consulted with the rpkGroup, notorious for its role in the gutting of universities across the United States.Most of the proposed cuts are in humanities disciplines, including several that are absolutely essential to VU’s status as a university and to its Lutheran identity, such as Theology, Philosophy, Music, and languages including German. Faculty in discontinued programs will be stripped of tenure and given a non-renewable contract for AY 2024-25, after which they will either be terminated or offered one-year contracts as needed to teach-out students in these programs, or to serve Gen Ed teaching needs. It is far from clear that the proposed course of action is consistent with existing University policies or AAUP guidelines regarding the demonstration of financial exigency and revocation of tenure. What is clear is that this constitutes a departure from VU’s mission and its longstanding sense of institutional identity as “a community of learning dedicated to excellence and grounded in the Lutheran tradition of scholarship, freedom, and faith.”Philip Melanchthon was Martin Luther’s “right-hand man,” and the first systematic theologian of the Reformation. He was also a devoted student of the humanities, and, given his key role in reforming universities after the Reformation, is rightly considered “the founding father of Lutheran higher education.” In his “Preface to Homer,” Melanchthon wrote:"I consider in my mind these admirable gifts of God, namely the study of literature and of the humanities – and apart from the gospel of Christ this world holds nothing more splendid nor more divine...."[1]Melanchthon understood that humanistic study is “most conducive” to “arousing one to virtue and for forming the mind,” and hence that it is the the mechanism “by which that part of us that alone deserves the name ‘human,’ that is made in the image of God and for the possession of true and everlasting happiness, was meant to be refined and roused.” “Without this noble teaching,” he said, no one is sufficiently suitable for managing the other arts or for performing great things.”In the middle decades of the 20th century, President O.P. Kretzmann cast a vision for VU consistent with Melanchthon’s vision for higher education. VU was to be a place where “Athens and Jerusalem” could meet, holding fast to eternal truths about God and humanity, while finding innovative ways of applying them in a changing world. It is this vision to which VU has aspired ever since, shaping its ethos and its graduates.For most of the ensuing half-century, VU pursued this ideal with great success. But over the last fifteen years or so, a number of factors have driven the institution ever farther from Melanchthon’s vision for humanistic education, and from Kretzmann’s vision for VU. The proposed discontinuances – which include the primary disciplinary avatars of “Athens” (Philosophy) and “Jerusalem” (Theology) – demonstrate that the current leadership has completely lost sight of this vision.The challenges faced by VU are not unique. They are pervasive in higher education today. But none of VU’s peer institutions are taking such drastic measures, and other universities – such as Purdue, Arizona State, and the University of Washington – are finding creative solutions that have strengthened the humanities while also strengthening enrollments. Given VU’s Lutheran identity, its history, and its heritage, it ought to try to do the same. Final decisions about program discontinuances will be made after April 30, 2024, so now is the time to voice opposition.We, the undersigned, call on VU’s President, Jose Padilla, its Provost, Eric Johnson, and its Board of Directors,to recommit to the vision that previously made VU one of the top regional universities in the Midwest,to halt their plan to discontinue programs and strip faculty of tenure, andto work collaboratively with the faculty to address VU’s financial challenges.***Signatories may also wish to send an email in support of threatened programs to the following members of VU’s board and upper administration: E-Mail list: Jose.Padilla@valpo.edu, Eric.Johnson@valpo.edu, lua.board@valpo.eduAdministrators: President Jose Padilla, Provost Eric Johnson.Board Members: David A. Bochnowski, Cristal M. Brisco, Emily Chase, Jeffrey H. Dobbs, Mark H. Duesenberg, Craig Dwight, Susan Jenny Ehr, Carolyn Schlie Femovich, Geoff Gilmore, Louie Gonzalez, Christopher Good, Robert D. Hansen, Jr., Mark P. Helge, Danielle Carter Iddins, Colette J. Irwin-Knott, Bruce R. Laning, Marian J. Moon, Andrew N. Nunemaker, Noe M. Ortega, Christopher Petrini-Poli, Lindsay Roettger, Philip C. Spahn, Jon A. Steinbrecher, Paul A. Strasen, Julie M. Winkler[1] All citations from Melanchthon are from his Orations on Philosophy and Education (S. Kusukawa, ed., C.Salazar, tr., Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Save the Humanities at Valparaiso University
On March 1, 2024, the leadership of Valparaiso University announced that nearly 30 undergraduate major, minor and certificate programs, staffed by faculty in over 15 disciplines, had been placed under review for discontinuance. This announcement was made after VU leadership consulted with the rpkGroup, notorious for its role in the gutting of universities across the United States.
Most of the proposed cuts are in humanities disciplines, including several that are absolutely essential to VU’s status as a university and to its Lutheran identity, such as Theology, Philosophy, Music, and languages including German. Faculty in discontinued programs will be stripped of tenure and given a non-renewable contract for AY 2024-25, after which they will either be terminated or offered one-year contracts as needed to teach-out students in these programs, or to serve Gen Ed teaching needs.
It is far from clear that the proposed course of action is consistent with existing University policies or AAUP guidelines regarding the demonstration of financial exigency and revocation of tenure. What is clear is that this constitutes a departure from VU’s mission and its longstanding sense of institutional identity as “a community of learning dedicated to excellence and grounded in the Lutheran tradition of scholarship, freedom, and faith.”
Philip Melanchthon was Martin Luther’s “right-hand man,” and the first systematic theologian of the Reformation. He was also a devoted student of the humanities, and, given his key role in reforming universities after the Reformation, is rightly considered “the founding father of Lutheran higher education.” In his “Preface to Homer,” Melanchthon wrote:
"I consider in my mind these admirable gifts of God, namely the study of literature and of the humanities – and apart from the gospel of Christ this world holds nothing more splendid nor more divine...."[1]
Melanchthon understood that humanistic study is “most conducive” to “arousing one to virtue and for forming the mind,” and hence that it is the the mechanism “by which that part of us that alone deserves the name ‘human,’ that is made in the image of God and for the possession of true and everlasting happiness, was meant to be refined and roused.” “Without this noble teaching,” he said, no one is sufficiently suitable for managing the other arts or for performing great things.”
In the middle decades of the 20th century, President O.P. Kretzmann cast a vision for VU consistent with Melanchthon’s vision for higher education. VU was to be a place where “Athens and Jerusalem” could meet, holding fast to eternal truths about God and humanity, while finding innovative ways of applying them in a changing world. It is this vision to which VU has aspired ever since, shaping its ethos and its graduates.
For most of the ensuing half-century, VU pursued this ideal with great success. But over the last fifteen years or so, a number of factors have driven the institution ever farther from Melanchthon’s vision for humanistic education, and from Kretzmann’s vision for VU. The proposed discontinuances – which include the primary disciplinary avatars of “Athens” (Philosophy) and “Jerusalem” (Theology) – demonstrate that the current leadership has completely lost sight of this vision.
The challenges faced by VU are not unique. They are pervasive in higher education today. But none of VU’s peer institutions are taking such drastic measures, and other universities – such as Purdue, Arizona State, and the University of Washington – are finding creative solutions that have strengthened the humanities while also strengthening enrollments. Given VU’s Lutheran identity, its history, and its heritage, it ought to try to do the same.
Final decisions about program discontinuances will be made after April 30, 2024, so now is the time to voice opposition.
We, the undersigned, call on VU’s President, Jose Padilla, its Provost, Eric Johnson, and its Board of Directors,
to recommit to the vision that previously made VU one of the top regional universities in the Midwest,to halt their plan to discontinue programs and strip faculty of tenure, andto work collaboratively with the faculty to address VU’s financial challenges.
***
Signatories may also wish to send an email in support of threatened programs to the following members of VU’s board and upper administration:
E-Mail list: Jose.Padilla@valpo.edu, Eric.Johnson@valpo.edu, lua.board@valpo.edu
Administrators: President Jose Padilla, Provost Eric Johnson.
Board Members: David A. Bochnowski, Cristal M. Brisco, Emily Chase, Jeffrey H. Dobbs, Mark H. Duesenberg, Craig Dwight, Susan Jenny Ehr, Carolyn Schlie Femovich, Geoff Gilmore, Louie Gonzalez, Christopher Good, Robert D. Hansen, Jr., Mark P. Helge, Danielle Carter Iddins, Colette J. Irwin-Knott, Bruce R. Laning, Marian J. Moon, Andrew N. Nunemaker, Noe M. Ortega, Christopher Petrini-Poli, Lindsay Roettger, Philip C. Spahn, Jon A. Steinbrecher, Paul A. Strasen, Julie M. Winkler
[1] All citations from Melanchthon are from his Orations on Philosophy and Education (S. Kusukawa, ed., C.Salazar, tr., Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Promoted by 38 supporters
0Supporters
SAVE Hot Wrench Auto LLC & Allow To Maintain Business @ 714 Hazel Street - Auburn, IN
Hot Wrench Auto LLC has been faced with a potential serious predicament. As you all know, everyone in government form has to be happy when it comes to an individual owning and operating a business. When it comes to Hot Wrench Auto LLC, everyone is ecstatic, from the customers, to the state and federal government. Unfortunately, a disgruntled neighbor on a different street, another small business across town, and the city of auburn wants us to close shop doors. The MAIN issue in all of this is that the shop is being ran off of my property that is NOT ZONED correctly. I have tried to correct this and have paid the money and attended the city "board zoning appeals" meeting to ask to be able to continue business, with the board members favoring me and my business BUT saying they just cannot allow it. I COULD try to rezone, ALTHOUGH they say it would be very very hard to get it passed. If anyone know me and my family, they know how this business is OUR WHOLE LIFE. I take pride in this business and how we operate. This might not seem like a big deal for some of you, but this is life changing for me/us. I have looked at other options with buying a commercial property, or land to build, but it's just not feasible. Land is currently 30-40k an acre. We just cannot do it right now. Please, consider signing this and standing behind Hot Wrench Auto, as I feel we deserve a chance just like everyone else does. I am very thankful for everyone who has already reached out and feel that this petition should only HELP our process in staying above water through this difficult time.
SAVE Hot Wrench Auto LLC & Allow To Maintain Business @ 714 Hazel Street - Auburn, IN
Hot Wrench Auto LLC has been faced with a potential serious predicament. As you all know, everyone in government form has to be happy when it comes to an individual owning and operating a business. When it comes to Hot Wrench Auto LLC, everyone is ecstatic, from the customers, to the state and federal government. Unfortunately, a disgruntled neighbor on a different street, another small business across town, and the city of auburn wants us to close shop doors. The MAIN issue in all of this is that the shop is being ran off of my property that is NOT ZONED correctly. I have tried to correct this and have paid the money and attended the city "board zoning appeals" meeting to ask to be able to continue business, with the board members favoring me and my business BUT saying they just cannot allow it. I COULD try to rezone, ALTHOUGH they say it would be very very hard to get it passed. If anyone know me and my family, they know how this business is OUR WHOLE LIFE. I take pride in this business and how we operate. This might not seem like a big deal for some of you, but this is life changing for me/us. I have looked at other options with buying a commercial property, or land to build, but it's just not feasible. Land is currently 30-40k an acre. We just cannot do it right now. Please, consider signing this and standing behind Hot Wrench Auto, as I feel we deserve a chance just like everyone else does. I am very thankful for everyone who has already reached out and feel that this petition should only HELP our process in staying above water through this difficult time.
See news on the petition you signed
